Hi Volker,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 10:22 AM Volker Braun wrote:
> Yes in a perfect world, but then you don't get a gold star for satisfying
> some purity test. We should just do the minimal amount of work to get us
> where we want to be. Lets focus on the direction to go and not too much on
> th
On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 02:22 -0700, Volker Braun wrote:
> Yes in a perfect world, but then you don't get a gold star for satisfying
> some purity test. We should just do the minimal amount of work to get us
> where we want to be. Lets focus on the direction to go and not too much on
> the process
Yes in a perfect world, but then you don't get a gold star for satisfying
some purity test. We should just do the minimal amount of work to get us
where we want to be. Lets focus on the direction to go and not too much on
the process.
On Friday, April 19, 2024 at 7:18:03 PM UTC+2 Michael Orlitz
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 09:46 -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> Michael, note that in my message I asked for a vote on that dependency
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36676.
>
Even if 36676 gets approval, 36964 must be reverted. It was not
meaningfully voted upon.
--
You received this m
On Friday, April 19, 2024 at 3:47:38 AM UTC-7 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 2024-04-18 14:18:37, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> As an alternative to the proposal to back out the
> PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36964 whose *disputed dependency
> PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36676 w
On 2024-04-18 14:18:37, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> As an alternative to the proposal to back out the
> PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36964 whose *disputed dependency
> PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36676 which had not reached the
> required 2:1 supermajority *o
Another attempt at derailing the ongoing vote, not unexpected.
Besides, Matthias must be really the greatest democrat of all - 1st he blocks a
part of electorate from voting at the designated venue, and then invite
everyone to vote there.
I urge everyone to ignore this alternative vote - to pro
Dear all:
As an alternative to the proposal to back out the
PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36964 whose *disputed dependency
PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36676 which had not reached the
required 2:1 supermajority *of the dispute-resolution process *(it
currently only has a
