Le samedi 21 novembre 2020 à 10:58:17 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:32 AM Eric Gourgoulhon
> >
> > Well, this is more an issue with that particular repository (
> https://github.com/sagemath/more-sagemath-tutorials) than with Binder and
> Sage. For instance,
>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:32 AM Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 20 novembre 2020 à 10:40:07 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>
>>
>> there are potentially more ways to run sagemath online, e.g. it used
>> to be possible at some point to run it in mybinder, IIRC.
>> Now it's broken, howe
PS. as far as current funding for the sagemath (itself - sagemath's
dependencies are another story, some enjoy support by NumFocus, DFG, CZI,
etc etc, some are doing well in this sense, e.g. Jupyter, R, some have
nothing, some are orphaned/taken over by sagemath) project goes, very
minimal funding
Hi Doris,
CoCalc is not something we have any control over here. I cc this to CoCalc
webmaster, in case.
sagemath.org itself does not store any personal data (as far as I know - it
ought to be double-checked though) and thus does not have to worry about
GDPR (I am not a lawyer, though).
HTH
Dima
Hi all,
since I’m not one of the >>old boys<< in sagemath, I read some background when
this mailthread began.
Then I went to CoCalc and searched for something like >>imprint<< oder >>legal
notice<<, since I live in the EU and wanted to know If I could recommend using
this with students. I found
Le vendredi 20 novembre 2020 à 11:58:52 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
> PS: btw, I am also +1 with Dima proposal regarding the web page.
>
PPS: I forgot to mention (this is so obvious to me), that CoCalc is a great
tool; I am using it for my research, to share notebooks with collaborators,
PS: btw, I am also +1 with Dima proposal regarding the web page.
Le vendredi 20 novembre 2020 à 11:32:26 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
> Le vendredi 20 novembre 2020 à 10:40:07 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
>>
>> there are potentially more ways to run sagemath online, e.g. it used
>> t
Le vendredi 20 novembre 2020 à 10:40:07 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> there are potentially more ways to run sagemath online, e.g. it used
> to be possible at some point to run it in mybinder, IIRC.
> Now it's broken, however:
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-binder-env/issues/9
>
>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:34 PM 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
wrote:
>
> First, let me acknowledge my respect and admiration to William for his
> contributions both to Sage and for having such a great service such as
> CoCalc. However, I must also disagree with having this being linked with
First, let me acknowledge my respect and admiration to William for his
contributions both to Sage and for having such a great service such as
CoCalc. However, I must also disagree with having this being linked with
the Sage logo as these are separate entities both in their mission and
content.
I can't figure out how to reply in Google groups web interface all of a
sudden ... hope this finds the right thread.
There are indeed various places online where the distinction has been
difficult - for years I have had to try to correct people saying "Sage is
now CoCalc" when it's more complex, f
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:41 PM Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
> If you look at https://www.sagemath.org/
> you can see four links to cocalc, one of them hidden behind the icon "sage".
This icon should be replaced by CoCalc's icon:
https://cocalc.com/img/cocalc-icon.svg
And a SageMathCell getting a simi
Dear all,
Beware that this message may be controversial.
If you look at https://www.sagemath.org/
you can see four links to cocalc, one of them hidden behind the icon "sage".
So, taking great care to acknowledge first all that William did and the
fact that Harald is currently maintaining the we
13 matches
Mail list logo
