On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM, William Stein wrote:
> It's not your fault -- the precise behavior of SAGE_FORTRAN as
> explained above is
> not documented anywhere, and I could see how it can be confusing. It
> would be very
> good to add this behavior to the README.txt file.
A new README.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>
I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable
SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That
appears to be gfortran.
>>>
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>
>>> I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable
>>> SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That
>>> appears to be gfortran.
>> No it doesn't. sage_fortran is a script (or link?) created by th
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>
>>> I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable
>>> SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That
>>> appears to be gfortran.
>>
>> No it doesn't. sage_fortran
William Stein wrote:
>> I also noticed that lapack ignores whatever the environment variable
>> SAGE_FORTRAN is set to, and uses 'sage_fortran' as a Fortran compiler. That
>> appears to be gfortran.
>
> No it doesn't. sage_fortran is a script (or link?) created by the
> spkg-install for the fort
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> William said a week or so ago
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/b4cf0f10ed040d5d?hl=en
>
> that "I think in sage-4.3 on, we should *only* include fortran compilers for
> OS X, and *nothing* else."
>
> If that is the case, a
William said a week or so ago
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/b4cf0f10ed040d5d?hl=en
that "I think in sage-4.3 on, we should *only* include fortran compilers for
OS X, and *nothing* else."
If that is the case, a new package will be needed that removes the other
binaries. I looked
