On 2017-09-06 17:28, Ximin Luo wrote:
If there is no "normalise" function for that context, perhaps there is at least
a method to check that two objects represent the same mathematical group, so:
I sort of agree in principle, but this is easier said than done. In many
cases, the mathematics i
On 06/09/2017 10:28, Ximin Luo wrote:
Jeroen Demeyer:
On 2017-09-06 14:53, Ximin Luo wrote:
I've seen numerous cases where Sage has to change the expected test output
simply because a dependency was upgraded. There has to be a more sustainable
way of achieving this...
Suggestions welcome...
Jeroen Demeyer:
> On 2017-09-06 14:53, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> I've seen numerous cases where Sage has to change the expected test output
>> simply because a dependency was upgraded. There has to be a more sustainable
>> way of achieving this...
>
> Suggestions welcome...
>
> Note that none of your
On 27 July 2017 at 10:01, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2017-07-26 00:46, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>
>> Would it be worth creating a fork of PARI
>>
>
> What *exactly* do you mean with that?
>
> I feel like "fork" is just a word and you can already consider the
> PARI-in-Sage t
On 2017-07-26 00:46, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
Would it be worth creating a fork of PARI
What *exactly* do you mean with that?
I feel like "fork" is just a word and you can already consider the
PARI-in-Sage to be a fork of PARI.
you would avoid the problems of a distri
