I also can't build atlas on my (fairly) new but low-powered portable.
So, I second that (although I admit I don't understand what all the
issues are that might be involved.)
-Mike
On 12/10/2010 09:50:06 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
on a 4-years old x86 laptop I have, I usually just cannot build At
-Original Message-
From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com on behalf of Bill Hart
Sent: Fri 12/10/2010 2:21 PM
To: sage-devel
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Goto Blas.
So I don't know what is considered a fast time to build BLAS, but on
my machine it was straightforward. I just typed make and it det
Seems like I didn't dig deep enough.
So it isn't actively developed by the TACC
anymore, it is given to the community to
maintain and take over development.
It only provides f77blas. I guess it would
be possible to create a cblas interface using
f2c but it is not really something anyone would
wan
-Original Message-
From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com on behalf of Jason Grout
Sent: Wed 12/8/2010 2:19 AM
To: sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Goto Blas.
On 12/7/10 12:05 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
> The Goto Blas are now under BSD license.
>
> http://www.tacc.utexas.e
Le 07/12/2010 14:22, Jason Grout a écrit :
On 12/7/10 12:05 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
The Goto Blas are now under BSD license.
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/
This could be a replacement for Atlas (these blas are supposed to be
faster).
According to the developer's wikipe
