Dear Martin,
Le vendredi 28 décembre 2018 14:07:51 UTC+1, Martin R a écrit :
>
> Just in case it was overlooked:
>
It *has* *been* overlooked, indeed. I just discovered thiqs post. Can't
reasonably test it before 2019, but will try to do so first thing text
year..
With abject apologies,
--
E
At least, the GAP upgrade is in 8.6.beta0
464c9142ab Trac #22626: Upgrade to GAP 4.10
I am also concerned about the Debian freeze and would be happy
to see a 8.6 soon enough... Volker, can you clarify the situation?
Le 28/12/2018 à 12:17, E. Madison Bray a écrit :
Okay, so 8.5 has been rele
Just in case it was overlooked: I fixed the bug reported by Emmanuel above
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26929, no review yet, (and no comments
either) though.
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from thi
Okay, so 8.5 has been released. What's the plan for 8.6?
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to release 8.5 this weekend...
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group
Hi
Seeing as the freezes are coming up on the buster side,
https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html ,
I have added two (amd64 and i386) buster buildbots.
(I mailed Volker and his ssh keys are added.)
Regards,
Jan
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 11:17, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Dec
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:10 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-12-20 00:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > How about trying to get this into 8.5? (or perhaps 8.5.1?)
>
> Rushing GAP 4.10 in Sage 8.5 doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
> Ideally, it should be sufficiently tested in betas.
Depends
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:01 AM Antonio Rojas wrote:
>
>
>
> El martes, 18 de diciembre de 2018, 12:50:44 (UTC+1), E. Madison Bray
> escribió:
>>
>> As pointed out by Samuel last month [1] the transition freeze (i.e.
>> new package versions) for the next major Debian release (buster) is
>> comin
On 2018-12-20 00:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
How about trying to get this into 8.5? (or perhaps 8.5.1?)
Rushing GAP 4.10 in Sage 8.5 doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
Ideally, it should be sufficiently tested in betas.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:56 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > I`ve just given #22626 (port gap/libgap to GAP 4.10) a positive
> > review (Erik deserves a round of applause for this great work!)
> > And the associated #26856 (gap_packages
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I`ve just given #22626 (port gap/libgap to GAP 4.10) a positive
> review (Erik deserves a round of applause for this great work!)
> And the associated #26856 (gap_packages/database) will be up for
> reviewing very soon,
> I`m just running
Same here
* 'Martin R' via sage-devel [2018-12-20 00:36:35]:
I have very little time, but if someone posts very precise compilation
instructions to upgrade from current develop, I would let my computer play
with it in the background.
(currently compiling 8.5.rc1)
In particular: was gap 4.10
I have very little time, but if someone posts very precise compilation
instructions to upgrade from current develop, I would let my computer play
with it in the background.
(currently compiling 8.5.rc1)
In particular: was gap 4.10 already tested with optional packages like
coxeter3 and the exp
Well...
Gap 4.10 and associated packages are a large change. I can't see it going
straight from positive_review to release. Including it would entail at
least a 8.5.rc2, and a decent shakedown period. This argues strongly in
favor of Volker's suggestion of releasing 8.5 "as is" from 8.5.rc1.
B
I`ve just given #22626 (port gap/libgap to GAP 4.10) a positive
review (Erik deserves a round of applause for this great work!)
And the associated #26856 (gap_packages/database) will be up for
reviewing very soon,
I`m just running one last round of tests; that is, it should be possible to get
GAP 4
14 matches
Mail list logo
