Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite

2014-10-21 Thread Volker Braun
If you look in the header the problem this time is precisely that the offending line is not guarded by #if OS_OBJECT_USE_OBJC On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 7:50:56 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > William Stein wrote: > > > This pattern has happened with literally every single OS X release:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite

2014-10-20 Thread Samuel Lelievre
William Stein wrote: > This pattern has happened with literally every single OS X release: So true! Searching sage lists for '_scproxy' reveals that the failure to build the _scproxy module happened before on new releases of OS X. See the search results for sage-release [0] and sage-devel [1], wi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite

2014-10-20 Thread kcrisman
> > > > This pattern has happened with literally every single OS X release: > > Agreed, this is really annoying, and +A to the person who is the hero each time! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group an

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite

2014-10-20 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using OS X 10.10 Yosemite. > > I was beta-testing it since July, and failing to build Sage. > > (Strangely I never thought about using the OSX-10.9 version. > I just tried and it works! Thanks Stefan for asking the > quest

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite

2014-10-17 Thread Francois Bissey
Oh that's fun. I usually get that message when xvcc cannot find its own libraries in stage 1. Something that is usually solved by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or here its mac equivalent) or using static libraries for gmp/mpfr/mpc. But this is new, someone hasn't been thinking forward about new version