I really like the new git based workflow. It makes it much faster to update
my dev version of sage, however this update failed. Using OS X 10.9.2 I
get:
lll:sage maarten$ sage -b
scons: `install' is up to date.
Updating Cython code
Finished compiling Cython code (time = 5.498483181 seconds)
On 2 April 2014 10:00, Maarten Derickx wrote:
> I really like the new git based workflow. It makes it much faster to update
> my dev version of sage, however this update failed. Using OS X 10.9.2 I
> get:
>
DId you do "make" before "sage -b"? You should.
John
> lll:sage maarten$ sage -b
> sco
You should have used "make" pynac has to be updated (the source of your
problem)
and sage -b won't do that.
Francois
On 2/04/2014, at 22:00, Maarten Derickx wrote:
> I really like the new git based workflow. It makes it much faster to update
> my dev version of sage, however this update fail
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 2:25:58 AM UTC+1, François wrote:
>
> I cannot see the pynac upgrade ticket in there, yet pynac has been updated
> to 0.3.2, is it in that list under a non-obvious name?
>
$ git log -1 build/pkgs/pynac
commit c1cf3fc54366d600d84d6a9648eced5034ea10bc
Author: Volker
Thanks John and Francois, that indeed solved the problem.
I still have to get used a bit to the new workflow and previous time sage
-b just worked, but it's good to know that I have to use make instead.
Le mercredi 2 avril 2014 11:12:04 UTC+2, François a écrit :
>
> You should have used “make” p
And finally, a doc build error! I already did make doc-clean and started
over, fails in exactly the same place. My apologies if this was already
mentioned somewhere.
[plotting ] loading pickled environment... not yet created
[plotting ] building [inventory]: targets for 27 source files that ar
> And for when you come back:
>>> Do you have either "local/include/ft2build.h" or
>>> "local/include/freetype2/ft2build.h" present.
>>>
> Indeed, the latter is present, but not the former.
>
See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16047 for the resolution - this
actually broke pip inst
Maarten Derickx wrote:
Thanks John and Francois, that indeed solved the problem.
I still have to get used a bit to the new workflow and previous time
sage -b just worked, but it's good to know that I have to use make instead.
'./sage -b' never triggered the (re)build of updated (or current) sp
Hi there,
Can all Mac fans try relocating a beta (or a binary, even) and seeing what
happens.
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16044?replyto=13#comment:9 suggests that
the answer is, "Nothing good." The question is how long ago that started
happening.
Thanks,
- kcrisman
--
You received th
