[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7 released

On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 2:54:48 PM UTC-7, Simon King wrote: > > Hi John, hi Samuel, > > On 2019-03-27, John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> Regarding the failures in src/sage/tests/modular_group_cohomology.py > >> related to the optional package p_group_cohomology (details follow), > >> can

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7 released

Hi John, hi Samuel, On 2019-03-27, John H Palmieri wrote: >> Regarding the failures in src/sage/tests/modular_group_cohomology.py >> related to the optional package p_group_cohomology (details follow), >> can others confirm? I've not seen it. The folder in which certain gap and singular

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7 released

On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 5:02:23 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Sun 2019-03-24 00:41 UTC, Volker Braun: > > > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.7. > > On Debian 9.8 ("stretch"), from a fresh git clone, building > python2-based SageMath with as many optional

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7 released

Hi Samuel, Le mercredi 27 mars 2019 13:02:23 UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : > > > Do others observe the failure with "make doc-pdf" on "de/a_tour_of_sage"? > Or should I check the babel package in my LaTeX installation? > > Same error here. This is with Python3-based Sage 8.7.rc0, with

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7 released

Sun 2019-03-24 00:41 UTC, Volker Braun: > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.7. On Debian 9.8 ("stretch"), from a fresh git clone, building python2-based SageMath with as many optional and experimental packages as I could install gives the following: - "make": success - "make