On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 7:45 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> what does happen if you run
>
> sage: from sage.graphs.strongly_regular_db import SRG_280_135_70_60
> sage: SRG_280_135_70_60()
>
> Does it print
>
> J_2 on cosets of 3.PGL(2,9): Graph on 280 vertices
here is a ticket that improves this fu
what does happen if you run
sage: from sage.graphs.strongly_regular_db import SRG_280_135_70_60
sage: SRG_280_135_70_60()
Does it print
J_2 on cosets of 3.PGL(2,9): Graph on 280 vertices
?
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, 19:06 Emmanuel Charpentier, <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After rebuil
After rebuilding from scratch, reinstalling packages (this time including
gap_packages), ptestlong gives me :
- no transient failure
- the usual permanent failure on gap_packages
- and a very strange, reproducible failure
on rc/sage/graphs/strongly_regular_db.pyx.
Details on the
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 7:37 AM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> which one? meataxe or p_group_cohomology? How would either of them
> influence the gap packages? And is there a ticket for it?
oops, I am sorry, memory failure :-)
It's https://github.com/gap-packages/Semigroups/issues/615
nothing
On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:
- incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta6: OK
- all tests from ptestlong passed
Eric.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from t
