Yes. sagenb is no a real optional package even with python2. We overlooked
the test suite when we made some test depending on it just “# py2”.
That was in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28805.
We probably really should have introduced `# sagenb` in insight.
But honestly I don’t care that much abo
> On Dec 1, 2019, at 15:15 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Here’s another one, just like the other one :-}
Built f
Broken with a Python 2 build. Do we care?
In particular, SageNB is not built with Python 2, but the doctester thinks
it should be:
./sage -t -p --all --long --logfile=logs/ptestlong.log
Running doctests with ID 2019-12-01-19-23-00-d57c8cb5.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,dochtml,py
> On Nov 26, 2019, at 16:28 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Built from a fresh clone of the develop branch on two m
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
cf9673bc59 (tag: 9.0.beta8) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.beta8
7b3f429848 Trac #28824: make doc-pdf race conditio
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 1:36 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le vendredi 29 novembre 2019 12:43:55 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>>
>> on that machine, could you
>>
>> ./sage -f gap_packages
>>
>> and try again?
>
>
> Done. No relief :-(. Your test on SRG_280_135_70_60 just took about 5 m
