I'm also getting random "memleak" errors that probably aren't. We are
mostly interested in linear memory growth with multiple calls (i.e. malloc
without free), not overall constants (like a new ring was used and the
parent is now cached somewhere). The memory leak tests should probably do
multi
> On Jun 6, 2021, at 11:40, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Built without problems from a fresh clone of the develop
What exactly is wrong with Ubuntu system readline ?
Is it underlinked?
config.log please.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021, 07:05 Samuel Lelièvre,
wrote:
> Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 21:35, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the new release.
> > >
> >
Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 21:35, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > Thanks for the new release.
> >
> > On Debian 10 buster
> > - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
> > - `make -s V=0` -- ok
> > - `make -s V=0 doc-pdf` -- ok
> > -
Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Thanks for the new release.
>
> On Debian 10 buster
> - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
> - `make -s V=0` -- ok
> - `make -s V=0 doc-pdf` -- ok
> - `make -s V=0 testlong` -- all tests pass
>
> On Ubuntu 20.04:
> - `
Thanks for the new release.
On Debian 10 buster
- `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
- `make -s V=0` -- ok
- `make -s V=0 doc-pdf` -- ok
- `make -s V=0 testlong` -- all tests pass
On Ubuntu 20.04:
- `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
- `
On Ubuntu 21-04, installation from a fresh git clone:
- Compilation : no problem.
- make ptestlong:
(Note that make ptestlong wanted ptest, which I iinstalled).
--
Total time for all tests: 3492.9 seconds
cpu time: 10407.5
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31921
> On 7/06/2021, at 13:33, François Bissey wrote:
>
> Checking how the feature works I think there was a mistake in the addition to
> sage/features/databases.py
> for knotinfo. It checks for a sage python module presence, which will always
> be
Checking how the feature works I think there was a mistake in the addition to
sage/features/databases.py
for knotinfo. It checks for a sage python module presence, which will always be
there since it is part of
sage, when it should have checked for a static file, like for the other
databases.
>
I have trouble building the documentation in sage-on-gentoo because of #30352
which doesn’t seem to be
implementing features properly. That error wouldn’t happen on vanilla sage
because the build is not done
in a sandbox and the build system wouldn’t try to write a system location.
* python3_9:
> On Jun 6, 2021, at 11:40 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Built without problems from a fresh clone of the develo
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
30ee8d6505 (tag: 9.4.beta1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
9.4.beta1
7690208434 Trac #31903: Build error
12 matches
Mail list logo
