Hello,
I've posted a patch for # -- http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/
--Mike
On Nov 26, 2007 3:34 PM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William wrote:
>
> > I think one student working for two weeks could greatly enhance solve,
> > but making it:
> >
> >(1) try the maxima
William wrote:
> I think one student working for two weeks could greatly enhance solve,
> but making it:
>
>(1) try the maxima solve, and
>(2) if the maxima solve returns no solutions, do something further that
> involves numerics, e.g., calling to scipy's iterative solver.
>
> In pa
On Nov 26, 2007 12:55 PM, Francis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Subgroups of abelian groups:
>
> sage: G. = AbelianGroup(2)
> sage: A = G.subgroup([a])
> sage: B = G.subgroup([b])
> sage: A == B
> True
>
> Surely not!
I agree that this is dumb, and have made it trac ticket #1284.
http
Subgroups of abelian groups:
sage: G. = AbelianGroup(2)
sage: A = G.subgroup([a])
sage: B = G.subgroup([b])
sage: A == B
True
Surely not!
On the other hand for vector spaces:
sage: W. = QQ^2
sage: U = W.subspace([u])
sage: V = W.subspace([v])
sage: U == V
False
As expected.
--
Francis Clark
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jan Willemson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 26, 2007 8:24 AM
Subject: #712
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Professor Stein,
2 months ago I opened the bug #712 and we tried to work a little bit
on it during a bug day. We found out that it was an upstream
Hi,
> http://sagemath.org/SAGEbin/vmware/
> has been modified so that all files are < 2GB. So you might
> want to try it out and see if it works on your system, and report
> back either way.
actually I followed Jason's suggestion, namely I installed NTFS-3G on
my linux box and then convert
Hello,
I am trying to solve a system of matrix equations of the form:
transpose(B)*(Mi)*B==Ni
where i is in range(p) for some fixed p > 9, Mi and Ni have integer
entries, and all matrices are of size p by p. I want to solve for B
(it need not have integer entries).
I have tried a brute force
On Nov 26, 2007 1:42 AM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Sage team,
>
> i just upgraded sage on two machines. One has gcc 4.1.2 on it, the
> other has gcc 4.2.1.
> On the machine with 4.1.2, starting sage still looks like this:
> > sage
>
On Nov 26, 10:42 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Sage team,
>
> i just upgraded sage on two machines. One has gcc 4.1.2 on it, the
> other has gcc 4.2.1.
>
> On the machine with 4.1.2, starting sage still looks like this:> sage
>
> ---
Dear Sage team,
i just upgraded sage on two machines. One has gcc 4.1.2 on it, the
other has gcc 4.2.1.
On the machine with 4.1.2, starting sage still looks like this:
> sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.8.10, Release Date: 2007-10-28
10 matches
Mail list logo
