[sage-support] Re: Updated NORTON Internet Security And SAGE Stops Working

Hello, William. Thanks for your suggestions. I installed Firefox and also updated SAGE. That fixed the problem, without disabling NORTON. I can now access and use SAGE. Colin On Dec 26, 7:33 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 25, 2007 8:36 PM, Colin Keizer <[EMAIL PROTEC

[sage-support] Lost worksheets

I setup Sage 2.9.1 (binary) on a windows machine (vmware, running ubuntu 7.10) where the vmware file was located on what I thought was a safe institution SAN drive. Of course after working on couple of worksheets for a long time and inviting my colleagues to see them, there was a problem with th

[sage-support] Re: Lost worksheets

Sorry for the confusion, a newbie mistake with vmware. Apparrently the vmware file on the SAN was corrupted and when I ran vmware again I mistakenly loaded up a local copy of ubuntu with SAGE and there were no worksheets in that local version. Now I have to figure out how to recover the vmware i

[sage-support] corrupt file?

Has anybody had any trouble uncompressing the Ubuntu version of sage-2.9.1? http://sagemath.org/SAGEbin/linux/32bit/sage-2.9.1-linux-ubuntu-32bit-i686-Linux.tar.gz it seems to be corrupt. Thanks in advance. -- Hector --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group,

[sage-support] Re: corrupt file?

On Dec 28, 2007 12:25 PM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anybody had any trouble uncompressing the Ubuntu version of sage-2.9.1? > http://sagemath.org/SAGEbin/linux/32bit/sage-2.9.1-linux-ubuntu-32bit-i686-Linux.tar.gz > > it seems to be corrupt. Thanks in advance. I just t

[sage-support] Re: Symbolic computation is slow

On Dec 27, 2007 1:53 PM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having problems doing symbolic computations in Sage. Calls to > rational_simplify() seem to take about .2 seconds each. Working > directly in Maxima is about 100 times faster. Mathematica is > something like 500 times faster. > >

[sage-support] Re: hg_doc question

On Dec 27, 2007 6:54 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi: > > Suppose you follow the instructions in the programming > manual to edit one of the latex doc files, such as prog,tex, > const.tex, tut.tex, etc. > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/html/prog/node31.html > > Roughly, the steps a

[sage-support] Re: sage-2.9.1.1 build problem

On Dec 27, 2007 9:54 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 27, 4:39 pm, "Kate Minola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Kate, > > > When I build sage-2.9.1.1 from source on the architectures > > of interest to me, I get an error when building > > > > mpfi-1.3.4-cvs20071125.p2

[sage-support] Re: Can't find my way around Sage source code

On Dec 27, 2007 4:42 AM, bill.p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the help so far. I've been able to make some minor changes > to the code > and checked the behaviour. I'm still a bit stuck on how it all ties > together. I have added > a new routine to the C++ code, but so far I've been un

[sage-support] Re: bug/missing feature in plot?

On Dec 27, 2007 4:38 AM, bdsatish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sorry sage is so hard to use! What can we learn from the above? > > The main problem is acsc versus arccsc, which caused confusion. > > Should we change the names of the "arc" functions to arc* instead of a*? > > > > Maple: uses

[sage-support] Re: Pexpect: pty.fork() failed: out of pty devices

On Dec 27, 2007 6:11 AM, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got the error in subject while trying the new ECM().one_curve() command > in sage-2.9. The problem might be due to the fact that I perform thousands of > calls to ECM().one_curve(), and maybe pexpect does not correctly frees p

[sage-support] Re: pylab examples [was Small correction for "Constructions ..."]

On Dec 27, 2007 8:35 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2007 12:45 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 26, 2007 10:19 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm thinking of adding matplotlib and jmol to the history and completely > > > r

[sage-support] Re: Pexpect: pty.fork() failed: out of pty devices

William, > > I got the error in subject while trying the new ECM().one_curve() command > > in sage-2.9. The problem might be due to the fact that I perform thousands > > of > > calls to ECM().one_curve(), and maybe pexpect does not correctly frees pty > > devices. > > I'm glad you're str

[sage-support] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released

On Dec 27, 2007 9:37 PM, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 22, 2007 1:16 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did you first run the VMware vmshrink utility, then turn the vmware > > machine off and exit vmware before creating the 7z file? Also, > > how big is your

[sage-support] Re: Sage-2.9

I posted an install log (for SAGE 2.9.1.1) here: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kedlaya/install.log And re my compiler version: the result of gcc -v is: Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/sha

[sage-support] Re: pylab examples [was Small correction for "Constructions ..."]

On Dec 28, 2007 4:38 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 27, 2007 8:35 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 27, 2007 12:45 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 26, 2007 10:19 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >

[sage-support] Re: hg_doc question

On Dec 28, 2007 3:36 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 27, 2007 6:54 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > Suppose you follow the instructions in the programming > > manual to edit one of the latex doc files, such as prog,tex, > > const.tex, tut.te