Dear William,
On Mar 5, 11:51 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I just tried to replicate your problem above on sage.math (64-bit linux),
> 32-bit athlon linux, and 32-bit OS X 10.5, and in every case your code above
> works fine -- i.e., nothing goes wrong.Can you really r
I've had some luck running the sage-2.10.2-linux-32bit-debian-i686-Linux
binaries under FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE (manually upgraded) using linux emulation
(linux_base-fc-4_10 = fedora core 4.10 distribution files); basic calculus
and arithmetic work from the interactive shell, the notebook runs with 3D
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:10 PM, dean moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I've been tempted to do something with a machine gun ...
>
> Grabbed m4-1.4.10 & unpacked it. Still get the same error, "SAGE BUILD
> ERROR:
> Command 'm4' not found" when cd-ing into sage's directory & typing make, as
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Neal Laurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have just installed SAGE on my MAC book, and it works fine there. But
> >> I would like to use it from my desk P
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Neal Laurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have just installed SAGE on my MAC book, and it works fine there. But
>> I would like to use it from my desk PC (Windows XP). The PC has a bigger
>> display. I opened Firefox on the PC, entered
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William,
> Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I had not set it. Some more
> problems with the compile on powerpc Linux. I get:
> ./lisp.run -on-error appease -B . -N locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8 -
> Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1
William,
Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I had not set it. Some more
problems with the compile on powerpc Linux. I get:
./lisp.run -on-error appease -B . -N locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8 -
Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1800KW -x "(and (load \"init.lisp\") (sys::
%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t
On Mar 5, 2008, at 2:47 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>> A couple of questions:
>>
>> What's the problem with deleting static libraries after the build?
>> They aren't used once the compilation is done.
>
> If you touch e.g. integer.pyx and "sage -b" you'll need libgmp.a,
> that's all.
> If not
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:22 AM, AEatUALR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you see the mympi python/mpi module showing up as an optional
> package in sage?
>
> http://peloton.sdsc.edu/~tkaiser/mympi/
>
> I see openmpi and mpi4py there (which is great).
Do you have any interest in being the o
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:31 PM, dean moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sending this to the whole group -- no reason.
>
> Sure, will document it let you know when I have something "nice." The word
> "spline"
> seems to occur in two pages I find.
Thanks!
>
> In other news, I finally dual-bo
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear sage supporters,
>
> a strange error occurs in sage 2.10.2 in the following way:
>
> sage: R. = QQ[]
> sage: f = x^3 + x + 1; g = x^3 - x - 1
> sage: r = f.resultant(g)
> sage: R.__dict__
> {'_PolynomialRing_gen
> A couple of questions:
>
> What's the problem with deleting static libraries after the build?
> They aren't used once the compilation is done.
If you touch e.g. integer.pyx and "sage -b" you'll need libgmp.a, that's all.
If nothing gets ever compiled you are good. However, adding a block "%cyt
Jason Grout wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> dean moore wrote:
>>> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
>>> > report it. Do the following
>>> > in an online SAGE notebook:
>>> >
>>>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> didier deshommes wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> dean moore wrote:
> >> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
> >> > rep
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> didier deshommes wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> dean moore wrote:
> >> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
> >> > re
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>The other problem I am facing on powerpc Linux is with compiling
> with Fortran. Some parts of SAGE accept gfortran and others do not.
It is definitely possible to build all of Sage only using gfortran, since
didier deshommes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> dean moore wrote:
>> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
>> > report it. Do the following
>> > in an online SAGE notebook:
>> >
>> > /1+1/
>> >
>> > We
Hi Neal,
When you start up the notebook on the Mac, pass the option
server='192.168.1.103' and then you should able to access it on you
Windows box by going to https://192.168.1.103:8000 . Let me know if
that works.
--Mike
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> dean moore wrote:
>> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
>> > report it. Do the following
>> > in an online SAGE notebook:
>> >
>> > /1+1/
>> >
>> > We ge
Hi, Martin,
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ryan Hinton wrote:
>> What if I want to develop in certain sections (coding theory, maybe
>> some graph theory)?
>
> I wouldn't recommend deleting static libraries because it is too
> easy to shoot
> yo
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> dean moore wrote:
> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
> > report it. Do the following
> > in an online SAGE notebook:
> >
> > /1+1/
> >
> > We get two. Now run the following:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> dean moore wrote:
> > When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
> > report it. Do the following
> > in an online SAGE notebook:
> >
> > /1+1/
> >
> > We get two. Now run the following:
dean moore wrote:
> When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
> report it. Do the following
> in an online SAGE notebook:
>
> /1+1/
>
> We get two. Now run the following:
>
> /# Limaçon
> 1+1
> /
> Get:
>
> /Exception (click to the left for traceback):
> ...
> Syn
When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to report
it. Do the following
in an online SAGE notebook:
*1+1*
We get two. Now run the following:
*# Limaçon
1+1
*
Get:
*Exception (click to the left for traceback):
...
SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xe7' in file
/home/s
Hi Michael,
The other problem I am facing on powerpc Linux is with compiling
with Fortran. Some parts of SAGE accept gfortran and others do not.
Here is what I see:
checking for Fortran 77 libraries of sage_fortran...
checking how to get verbose linking output from gcc -std=gnu99... -v
checking
Dear sage supporters,
a strange error occurs in sage 2.10.2 in the following way:
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: f = x^3 + x + 1; g = x^3 - x - 1
sage: r = f.resultant(g)
sage: R.__dict__
{'_PolynomialRing_general__cyclopoly_cache': {},
'_PolynomialRing_general__generator': x,
'_PolynomialRing_general
Hi Michael,
I untarred the gmp package and built it again changing makefiles to
delete the -m64 option from CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS. It built properly and
now the rest of SAGE is compiling properly.
The problem was that by default the gmp package chose 64 bit
compilation. We may need to disable
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:57 AM, dean moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks! That worked nicely.
>
> But should this type of thing be documented, as others may face this?
>
> Dean
>
Sure! Could you just take the current docs for spline?, modifying them the
way you wish they were regarding t
Thanks! That worked nicely.
But should this type of thing be documented, as others may face this?
Dean
---
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:03 PM, dean moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'm trying to spline the unit circle
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Neal Laurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have just installed SAGE on my MAC book, and it works fine there. But
> I would like to use it from my desk PC (Windows XP). The PC has a bigger
> display. I opened Firefox on the PC, entered the local IP address of
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> What if I want to develop in certain sections (coding theory, maybe
> some graph theory)?
I wouldn't recommend deleting static libraries because it is too easy to shoot
yourself in the foot if you do. If you only strip your binaries/libraries
the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > SAGE now tries to support numpy (and matlab)-style indexing, by poking
> > at its underlying __getitem__ and __getslice__ (thanks to a suggestion
> > by William):
I have just installed SAGE on my MAC book, and it works fine there.
But I would like to use it from my desk PC (Windows XP). The PC has a
bigger display. I opened Firefox on the PC, entered the local IP
address of the MAC (192.168.1.103) and I get an acknowledgment from
the Apache Web server. Then
What if I want to develop in certain sections (coding theory, maybe
some graph theory)?
On Mar 5, 3:38 pm, "Michael.Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ryan Hinton wrote:
> > I would like to use and contribute to Sage on my university's Linux
> > cluster, but I only have about 2.0 GB disk space
I have just installed SAGE on my MAC book, and it works fine there. But
I would like to use it from my desk PC (Windows XP). The PC has a bigger
display. I opened Firefox on the PC, entered the local IP address of the
MAC (192.168.1.103) and I get an acknowledgment from the Apache Web
server.
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> I would like to use and contribute to Sage on my university's Linux
> cluster, but I only have about 2.0 GB disk space total for programs
> and data. An Ubuntu installation (sage-2.10.2, I believe) weighed in
> at about 1.3 GB. I don't think this
Ryan Hinton wrote:
> I would like to use and contribute to Sage on my university's Linux
> cluster, but I only have about 2.0 GB disk space total for programs
> and data. An Ubuntu installation (sage-2.10.2, I believe) weighed in
> at about 1.3 GB. I don't think this leaves me enough room for da
Will you allow single-argument indexing as well?
The Matlab convention is that indexing using a single argument indexes
vec(A) instead of A.
That's often useful, e.g., to update the diagonal of an nxn matrix,
you could write A[::n+1] = 1.0.
More generally, it allows you to easily update a subset
Do you see the mympi python/mpi module showing up as an optional
package in sage?
http://peloton.sdsc.edu/~tkaiser/mympi/
I see openmpi and mpi4py there (which is great).
Albert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegrou
I would like to use and contribute to Sage on my university's Linux
cluster, but I only have about 2.0 GB disk space total for programs
and data. An Ubuntu installation (sage-2.10.2, I believe) weighed in
at about 1.3 GB. I don't think this leaves me enough room for data.
Is there a convenient w
"didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SAGE now tries to support numpy (and matlab)-style indexing, by poking
> at its underlying __getitem__ and __getslice__ (thanks to a suggestion
> by William):
Great!
Another nice feature of numpy is *assigning* using numpy-style indexing.
For exa
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hector Villafuerte wrote:
...
> > So my question: is there a SAGEly way to plot this type of vector fields?
> > Thanks in advance!
>
> There is now! It turned out to be a pretty simple fix to
> plot_vector_field; see
Eric Drechsel wrote:
> Jason: wow, that was quick. I'll try out the plot_vector_field patch
> as soon as I figure out how to test patches etc
No problem. The patch is included in 2.10.3, so the functionality
should be available in just a day or two at the most (2.10.3 is almost
released).
>
43 matches
Mail list logo
