Hi there,
i'm having yet another problem with plotting the Weierstrass-p-
Function. This time i'd like do create a contour plot of it. I did the
following:
sage: i=CDF.0
sage: tau=i
sage: Om=pari([1,tau])
sage: def f(a,b): return abs(Om.ellwp(a+b*i))
sage: T=contour_plot(f, (0.1,0.9), (0.1,0.9),
On May 19, 2008, at 7:08 PM, Dan Pillone wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I know that for lots of negative real numbers x^x is not defined,
> but for some values of x, such as x=-1 or x=-1/3 there is a real
> number answer and I don't see anything plotted. Why isn't anythng
> plotted at those discrete set
Hi,
Yes, I know that for lots of negative real numbers x^x is not defined,
but for some values of x, such as x=-1 or x=-1/3 there is a real
number answer and I don't see anything plotted. Why isn't anythng
plotted at those discrete set of values?
Dan
On May 16, 5:37 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Dan Shumow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Presently, in sage, is there anyway to computer the torsion subgroup
> of a curve over an arbitrary number field?
>
> I'm pouring through the documentation, and I see how to do it for a
> curve over the rationals. Is this
Presently, in sage, is there anyway to computer the torsion subgroup
of a curve over an arbitrary number field?
I'm pouring through the documentation, and I see how to do it for a
curve over the rationals. Is this not implemented for number fields?
Thanks,
Dan
--~--~-~--~~-
On May 19, 12:03 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Hehe, it is good to share the blame. I meant had I know that this
> issue causes this much trouble I would have attempted to do 3.0.2
> quicker instead of the two week cycle. Is there any way to test Cython
> introspection auto
On May 19, 2008, at 12:03 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On May 19, 7:39 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On May 19, 2008, at 10:28 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>>> there hasn't been an official release with the fixed Cython yet,
>>> just
>>> 3.0.2.alpha0 and alpha1. It is now likely that
On May 19, 7:39 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On May 19, 2008, at 10:28 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > there hasn't been an official release with the fixed Cython yet, just
> > 3.0.2.alpha0 and alpha1. It is now likely that 3.0.2 will be out in 48
> > hours, so there is no point in ma
On May 19, 8:00 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Lon Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the prompt reply! One more question: the screenshot on the SAGE
> > website shows Sage running in the X11 environment, is having X11 installe
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Lon Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply! One more question: the screenshot on the SAGE
> website shows Sage running in the X11 environment, is having X11 installed
> still a requisite?
>
Absolutely not.When you run Sage on the m
Of course it wasn't 8.10. I am running Ubuntu 8.04. My mistake. :-)
A.
On May 18, 6:52 pm, Adam Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried a few settings in matplotlibrc and found that TkAgg worked.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
> On May 18, 4:10 pm, chu-ching huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On May 19, 2008, at 10:28 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On May 19, 7:18 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I thought this was fixed in the latest release. Until then, I guess,
>> you can install the spkg athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/
>> robertwb/cython/
>>
>> Downlo
On May 19, 7:18 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
> I thought this was fixed in the latest release. Until then, I guess,
> you can install the spkg athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/
> robertwb/cython/
>
> Download cython-0.9.6.14.p1.spkg and type "sage -i
> cython-0.9.
I thought this was fixed in the latest release. Until then, I guess,
you can install the spkg at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/
robertwb/cython/
Download cython-0.9.6.14.p1.spkg and type "sage -i
cython-0.9.6.14.p1.spkg"
- Robert
On May 18, 2008, at 1:16 AM, criceto11 wrote:
>
> I
14 matches
Mail list logo
