On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 at 01:43AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
> Cool. I just posted a note on Arxiv with a .sage program file, and
> I'm seeing the same problem. (I thought the doctests passed, but
> apparently they don't and I'm seeing the same problem; I think I got
> around this once by "including"
Yes, many thanks
Robert
On 10 Pro, 08:49, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 11:46 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> > Hello, is there any way how to access the last result in Sage?
> > Something like % in Maxima?
> > Thank you.
> > Ro
On Dec 9, 3:23 pm, acardh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> This works
> html(r'Donde $\Sigma$ es la sumatoria de los números... etc.' )
>
> but only works the first time. If you save & quit your work, after
> trying again it fails. This is because when saving it converts
> "números" to "números"
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 at 01:43AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Cool. I just posted a note on Arxiv with a .sage program file, and
>> I'm seeing the same problem. (I thought the doctests passed, but
>> apparently they don't and
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 at 04:40AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> Note that you could also submit a patch to Sage with the code you're
> doctesting. I did that with all the tests from both of the books I
> published, and I encourage you and many others to do the same with the
> code from your article.
Dan Drake wrote:
> While I am adding to this thread, I'll mention a trick: in the article,
> I want to mention how to get the .sage file -- but to do that, I need to
> know the arXiv URL. But how do you find out the eprint number before you
> submit? The answer is to make your submission early in
William Stein wrote:
>
> That "sage -t foo.sage" doesn't import the functions somehow is a
> sucky new-ish bug, that needs to be fixed ASAP, in my opinion. This
> is related to recent major changes in how sage -t works on *.sage
> files. See this ticket I just made:
>
> http://trac.sagema
William Stein wrote:
> Note that you could also submit a patch to Sage with the code you're
> doctesting.
> I did that with all the tests from both of the books I published, and
> I encourage you and many others to do the same with the code from your
> article. The code would go in a file
>
>
On Dec 10, 7:12 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > Note that you could also submit a patch to Sage with the code you're
> > doctesting.
> > I did that with all the tests from both of the books I published, and
> > I encourage you and many others to do the same
On Dec 10, 7:22 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 7:12 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, such code could be loaded into a running Sage session easily,
> > something like the contributions directory of maxima. Personally, I
> > would love if our
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>> Also, such code could be loaded into a running Sage session easily,
>> something like the contributions directory of maxima. Personally, I
>> would love if our special-purpose code (probably too specialized to be
>> included in Sage) were accessible to anyone that had Sag
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mabshoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Also, such code could be loaded into a running Sage session easily,
>>> something like the contributions directory of maxima. Personally, I
>>> would love if our special-purpose code (probably to
On Dec 10, 7:48 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Jason Grout
> >> The ultimate goal should be to get code into Sage since there is
> >> nearly always common code to factor out and getting more users for
> >> some infrastructure bits in Sage ha
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:44 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A Sage build is over a gigabyte, involves well over 5 million lines of
>> code, and is probably bigger than any other single math software
>> system in the world. And amazingly we're doing fine size-wise. I
>> think we can
On Dec 10, 9:15 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:44 AM, mabshoff
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> A Sage build is over a gigabyte, involves well over 5 million lines of
> >> code, and is probably bigger than any other single math software
> >> s
2008/12/10 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> but other than that there is nothing else in Sage I
> would consider myself to be unhappy about.
Wow, that's the best news I have heard all day!
John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-supp
Helo Sage community,
I want to know if Sage could deal with symbolic arrays and lists (by
symbolic I mean without specifying the concrete contents of list or
array)
For example I want to solve a system of equations containing lists and
arrays like this (here A and A' are arrays; B and B' lists;
x
The title pretty much says it all - for example, how would I create a
4x4 matrix whose (i,j)-th element is 1/(i+j)?
Thanks,
Alasdair
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
One way to do it (for a 10x10):
sage: n = 10
sage: M = Matrix(n,n,[[1/(i+j) for i in range(1,11)] for j in range(1,11)])
sage: M
[ 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/6 1/7 1/8 1/9 1/10 1/11]
[ 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/6 1/7 1/8 1/9 1/10 1/11 1/12]
[ 1/4 1/5 1/6 1/7 1/8 1/9 1/10 1/11 1/12 1/13]
[ 1/5 1/6
I think the order of the i and j is transposed (assuming row i and
column j):
sage: M = matrix(5,5,[[1/(i+j%2) for j in range(1,6)] for i in range
(1,6)])
sage: M
[1/2 1 1/2 1 1/2]
[1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3]
[1/4 1/3 1/4 1/3 1/4]
[1/5 1/4 1/5 1/4 1/5]
[1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/6]
s
M = matrix(5,5,[[1/(i
Thanks - I didn't know (being a COMPLETE newbie) about the "range"
command. Where in the documentation would I find this? - I've had a
bit of a search and couldn't find it.
Thanks again,
Alasdair
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-su
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:23:30 Alasdair wrote:
> Thanks - I didn't know (being a COMPLETE newbie) about the "range"
> command. Where in the documentation would I find this? - I've had a
> bit of a search and couldn't find it.
http://docs.python.org/tutorial/controlflow.html#the-range-function
Arn
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 10, 7:48 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Jason Grout
>
>
>
>
The ultimate goal should be to get code into Sage since there is
nearly always common code to factor out and getting more users for
some
23 matches
Mail list logo
