On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:20 PM, mabshoff
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 14, 7:30 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Spencer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> > I'm running Sage 3.2.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 (hardware: Macbook 3,1 Santa
>> > Rosa with Intel Core 2 Duo). On installing Sage and sta
On Dec 14, 7:30 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Spencer wrote:
Hi,
> > I'm running Sage 3.2.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 (hardware: Macbook 3,1 Santa
> > Rosa with Intel Core 2 Duo). On installing Sage and starting it up for
> > the first time I get the message:
>
> > "WAR
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:53 PM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
> I have some code which generates a bunch of expressions of the form
> Sum (n_i a_i) where each n_i is an integer and each a_i is an unknown
> in a field, and I'm most interested in the case when the field is GF
> (p). Set each of these
I have some code which generates a bunch of expressions of the form
Sum (n_i a_i) where each n_i is an integer and each a_i is an unknown
in a field, and I'm most interested in the case when the field is GF
(p). Set each of these expressions equal to zero. What's the best way
in Sage to solve the
"Mike Hansen" writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:04 PM, green351 wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > This is my first time emailing with a question and my first time
> > trying to use Sage (I'm a complete programming dunce). I'm trying to
> > do the following:
> > Given the tuple (p,q) in Z x
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 at 05:09PM -0800, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:04 PM, green351 wrote:
> > This is my first time emailing with a question and my first time
> > trying to use Sage (I'm a complete programming dunce). I'm trying to
> > do the following:
> > Given the tuple (p,q)
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Spencer wrote:
>
> I'm running Sage 3.2.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 (hardware: Macbook 3,1 Santa
> Rosa with Intel Core 2 Duo). On installing Sage and starting it up for
> the first time I get the message:
>
> "WARNING! This Sage install was built on a machine that support
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:04 PM, green351 wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This is my first time emailing with a question and my first time
> trying to use Sage (I'm a complete programming dunce). I'm trying to
> do the following:
> Given the tuple (p,q) in Z x Z and integer n I need to count the
> numb
Hi,
This is my first time emailing with a question and my first time
trying to use Sage (I'm a complete programming dunce). I'm trying to
do the following:
Given the tuple (p,q) in Z x Z and integer n I need to count the
number of integer-tuple solutions to the following
(p,q)=(a_1,b_1)+...+(a_n,
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ver?key=pCwvGVwSMxTzT6E2xNdo5fA&t=1229242768198000&pt=1229242748198000&diffWidget=true&s=AJVazbV8wTRdqv-uJ-exdnVEO7tqiCikJQ
answer below, quote here:
=
The following behavior is very confusing to me.
I define a progr
I'm running Sage 3.2.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 (hardware: Macbook 3,1 Santa
Rosa with Intel Core 2 Duo). On installing Sage and starting it up for
the first time I get the message:
"WARNING! This Sage install was built on a machine that supports
instructions that are not available on this computer. Sage
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Sand Wraith wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I want to plot a few lines:
>
> Line=line([])
> for i in [-10..3]:
>Line+=line([[0,0],[1.1+i/10,1.1]])
>
> and show it:
>
> show(Line,xmin=0)
>
> but output contains area below X axis. :-\
You want
show(Line,ymin=0,xmin=0)
--
On Dec 14, 2:44 am, daveloeffler wrote:
> That
>
> On Dec 13, 6:50 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > That sounds the best way. We'll make kernel_left/right (along with
> > left/right_kernel) the global functions, and people can do
>
> > kernel = left_kernel
>
> > in their init.sage or at the beginni
I think the following is also a source of frustration:
v=vector([1,2,3])
rm=matrix(v)#This will be a row matrix
cm=v.transpose()#This will be a column matrix.
What would the convention be for this one? This came up in another
discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_threa
On Dec 14, 7:16 am, "David Joyner" wrote:
> I'm guessing the asex are rendered last, so the lines get overwritten.
> You can use
>
> show(a1+a2+l1+l2+p,axes=False)
>
> or
>
> a1=arrow((0,0),(3,1),rgbcolor=(0,1,1))
> a2=arrow((0,0),(-3.5,2.5),rgbcolor=(0,0,1))
> l1=line([(0,0),(-3.5,0)],rgbcolor
Hello Giovanni,
most of the time it does "the right thing". If you really need call by
value, whatever type the argument is, you can (must) copy the argument
yourself. The copy module provides the methods copy.copy() and
copy.deepcopy() for this situation.
With best regards,
Lars
--~--~
I'm guessing the asex are rendered last, so the lines get overwritten.
You can use
show(a1+a2+l1+l2+p,axes=False)
or
a1=arrow((0,0),(3,1),rgbcolor=(0,1,1))
a2=arrow((0,0),(-3.5,2.5),rgbcolor=(0,0,1))
l1=line([(0,0),(-3.5,0)],rgbcolor=(1,0,0), thickness=5)
l2=line([(0,0),(0,2.5)],rgbcolor=(0,1,0
Thank you Lars,
I had the feeling that this behavior
should be something related to Python,
but I was impressed by the inconsistency,
because in my first example everything
worked as (I) intended.
So, if this is a feature of Python I
have to study it carefully !
Best regards
Giovanni
On Dec
Hello Giovanni,
you have hit one of my favorite Python Pitfalls: Python does always
call by value, but sometimes it behaves like call by reference .
The explanation is hidden in a footnote in the tutorial. Please see
"Defining Functions" in "More Control Flow Tools" in the Python
Tutorial:
http:
On Dec 14, 2:44 am, daveloeffler wrote:
> That
>
> On Dec 13, 6:50 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > That sounds the best way. We'll make kernel_left/right (along with
> > left/right_kernel) the global functions, and people can do
>
> > kernel = left_kernel
>
> > in their init.sage or at the begin
Hi!
I want to plot a few lines:
Line=line([])
for i in [-10..3]:
Line+=line([[0,0],[1.1+i/10,1.1]])
and show it:
show(Line,xmin=0)
but output contains area below X axis. :-\
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroup
That
On Dec 13, 6:50 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> That sounds the best way. We'll make kernel_left/right (along with
> left/right_kernel) the global functions, and people can do
>
> kernel = left_kernel
>
> in their init.sage or at the beginning of their session, if they want.
\begin{devils-advoca
The following behavior is very confusing to me.
I define a program
def test(a):
b=a
b = a^2
return b
Then if I assign
x = 2
and then execute
test(x)
4
I get x squared and x unchanged:
x
2
However suppose now that I want the same on a single
element of a matrix and define
23 matches
Mail list logo
