Sorry !!
Let me try again !!
http://sites.google.com/site/mislwagroup/Home/eg_jsmath.3.4.pdf?attredirects=0
Elizabeth
On Aug 3, 11:37 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Elizabeth,
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Elizabeth Yip wrote:
>
> > John
> > The pdf file at
>
> >http://sites.google.com/site
Hi Elizabeth,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Elizabeth Yip wrote:
>
> John
> The pdf file at
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/mislwagro/Home/eg_jsmath.3.4.pdf?attredirects=0
>
> is the output from sage-3.4
I went to that URL and got a "Site not found" error.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~
John
The pdf file at
http://sites.google.com/site/mislwagro/Home/eg_jsmath.3.4.pdf?attredirects=0
is the output from sage-3.4
Thanks for the prompt response!
Elizabeth
On Aug 3, 10:12 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Aug 3, 9:39 pm, Elizabeth Yip wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > The line
>
> > jsma
On Aug 3, 9:39 pm, Elizabeth Yip wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The line
>
> jsmath("cos(2\phi)"+latex(1/x))
>
> in the sage-4.1 notebook produces different result from the sage-3.4
> notebook. The result in sage-3.4 is what I want.
Okay, in the latest version, I see
cos(2\phi)\frac{1}{x}
I don't have a
Hello,
The line
jsmath("cos(2\phi)"+latex(1/x))
in the sage-4.1 notebook produces different result from the sage-3.4
notebook. The result in sage-3.4 is what I want.
Thank you for your help!
Elizabeth Yip
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Dan Shumow wrote:
>> The above change is very sensible, since we know that outP is on
>> self.__E2, so should directly create a point on E2 and not check again
>> that our point is really on E2 (which is very expensive).
>
> I agree that we should make the change:
>
> The above change is very sensible, since we know that outP is on
> self.__E2, so should directly create a point on E2 and not check again
> that our point is really on E2 (which is very expensive).
I agree that we should make the change:
else:
outP = self.__E2(outP)
to
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:10 PM, VictorMiller wrote:
>
> Sorry, here's the definition of Q:
>
> Q = E.random_element()
>
> Victor
>
> On Aug 3, 8:45 pm, Simon King wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 4 Aug., 02:31, VictorMiller wrote:
>>
>> > Here are the commands I used:
>>
>> > qq = [z for z in primes(1
try using 'dashed' instead of '--'. Works for me.
I have no idea why '--' works for plotting lines but not vectors
(which are arrows) ...
Rado
On Aug 3, 3:46 pm, cesarnda wrote:
> what is wrong with the following:
>
> sage: v1 = vector([1,2])
> sage: v2 = vector([2,1])
> sage: p1 = plot(v1, rg
Hi Victor,
On 4 Aug., 03:10, VictorMiller wrote:
> Sorry, here's the definition of Q:
>
> Q = E.random_element()
Thanks! So, probably it is unrelated with the ticket I mentioned.
Also note that the computation time does not increase monotonely:
sage: for i in xrange(20): timeit('phi(Q)')
:
Sorry, here's the definition of Q:
Q = E.random_element()
Victor
On Aug 3, 8:45 pm, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 4 Aug., 02:31, VictorMiller wrote:
>
> > Here are the commands I used:
>
> > qq = [z for z in primes(10,10+100) if (z%12) == 11]
> > E = EllipticCurve(j=GF(qq[0])(1728))
Hi!
On 4 Aug., 02:31, VictorMiller wrote:
> Here are the commands I used:
>
> qq = [z for z in primes(10,10+100) if (z%12) == 11]
> E = EllipticCurve(j=GF(qq[0])(1728))
> # E has qq[0]+1 points over GF(qq[0])
> factor(qq[0]+1)
> P = ((qq[0]+1)//3)*E.random_element()
> K = [E(0),P,-P]
> p
Here are the commands I used:
qq = [z for z in primes(10,10+100) if (z%12) == 11]
E = EllipticCurve(j=GF(qq[0])(1728))
# E has qq[0]+1 points over GF(qq[0])
factor(qq[0]+1)
P = ((qq[0]+1)//3)*E.random_element()
K = [E(0),P,-P]
phi = E.isogeny(K)
for i in xrange(20): timeit('phi(Q)')
On
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:37 PM, VictorMiller wrote:
>
> As far as I know Maxima isn't involved -- I don't think that isogenies
> uses Maxima.
You can prove Maxima isn't involved by doing the computation then
exiting sage and seeing if it says "Exiting Maxima" when Sage is
quiting.
William
>
> V
On 4 Aug., 00:29, VictorMiller wrote:
...
> phi = E.isogeny([E(0),P,-P])
> for i in xrange(20): timeit('phi(Q)')
>
> 625 loops, best of 3: 1.17 ms per loop
> 625 loops, best of 3: 1.75 ms per loop
> 125 loops, best of 3: 2.1 ms per loop
> 125 loops, best of 3: 2.22 ms per loop
> 125 loops, bes
Hi Victor,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:29 AM, VictorMiller wrote:
>
> I was trying to find out how fast a calculation was (applying an
> isogeny of degree on an elliptic curve over
> a finite field). At first I noticed that when I repeated a timeit
> call with the same expression I was getting mono
As far as I know Maxima isn't involved -- I don't think that isogenies
uses Maxima.
Victor
On Aug 3, 6:58 pm, Simon King wrote:
> On 4 Aug., 00:29, VictorMiller wrote:
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > phi = E.isogeny([E(0),P,-P])
> > for i in xrange(20): timeit('phi(Q)')
>
> > 625 loops, best of 3: 1.17 m
I was trying to find out how fast a calculation was (applying an
isogeny of degree on an elliptic curve over
a finite field). At first I noticed that when I repeated a timeit
call with the same expression I was getting monotonically increasing
numbers, so I decided to try something more systemati
Just for the record ipod touch (which problably means iphone too) runs
sagenb.org without any problems. I must say really don't support
apple's policies and was planning on switching to android-based
solutions so hopefully those log-in glitches get fixed. Iphone has the
same problem that its onscr
what is wrong with the following:
sage: v1 = vector([1,2])
sage: v2 = vector([2,1])
sage: p1 = plot(v1, rgbcolor=(1,0,0))
sage: p2 = plot(v2, rgbcolor=(0,1,0))
sage: t1 = text("V1", (1,2.1), rgbcolor=(1,0,0))
sage: t2 = text("V2", (2,1.1), rgbcolor=(0,1,0))
sage: p3 = plot(v1 + v2, rgbcolor=(0,0,
Hi!
I can't sleep, when fearing PolyBoRi could calculate wrong:
Actually, it's probably just about the wrapper.
My CVS, which is very much the same as 0.6.3 gives me:
l="a111,a112,a121,a122,b111,b112,b211,b212,c111,c112".split(",")
In [2]:declare_ring(l, globals())
Out[2]:
In [3]:ideal=[a111 *
Hi,
On Aug 3, 7:39 pm, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> > The problem in my case is really one of scale. I have put a larger
> > example at the bottom of this message. When I try to find the
> > groebner basis in sage 4.1 (which seems to use polybori-0.5rc.p8) the
> > memory usage goes over 1.6GB and t
> The problem in my case is really one of scale. I have put a larger
> example at the bottom of this message. When I try to find the
> groebner basis in sage 4.1 (which seems to use polybori-0.5rc.p8) the
> memory usage goes over 1.6GB and then sage crashes. It is possible
> that it just isn't r
On Saturday 01 August 2009, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Aug 1, 4:09 pm, Martin Albrecht
>
> wrote:
> > sage: R. =
> > BooleanPolynomialRing(order='lex')
> > sage: I=(a111 * b111 * c111 + a112 * b112 * c112 - 1 , a111 * b211 * c111
> > + : a112 * b212 * c112 - 0 , a121 * b111 * c111
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Serge A. Salamanka wrote:
>
> Dear support,
>
> I'm having a bit of a problem with setting up Sage public server with
> several pool accounts.
>
> Everything is done according to recommendations on
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/DanDrake/JustEnoughSageServer
> except th
Dear support,
I'm having a bit of a problem with setting up Sage public server with
several pool accounts.
Everything is done according to recommendations on
http://wiki.sagemath.org/DanDrake/JustEnoughSageServer
except that I have to set up 750 permission for the group of sageusers
on /home/sag
hi simon and dan,
thanks for your answers. The thing is though, i don't intend to run
sage, the full sage, on a phone (!!), but i was hoping that these
state-of-the-art telephones that people seem to love could perhaps be
used as conveniently as the hand-calculators we had 15 years ago. Say,
you
Pierre writes:
> I was thinking about buying an android phone, and getting SAGE to work
> was one of the questions, [...]
>
> also, now that android supports python, is it possible to install
> numpy, or parts of SAGE, directly? anyone has tried that ?
Pierre,
As Simon pointed out, you can run
William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Robert Dodier wrote:
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>>> Sage lists are Python lists, which are very different than
>>> Mathematica lists.
>> You say that as if it's a fact of geography which can't be changed.
>>
>>> to change all lists would be
Hi Pierre,
On Aug 3, 2:17 pm, Pierre wrote:
> also, now that android supports python, is it possible to install
> numpy, or parts of SAGE, directly? anyone has tried that ?
I think this post is related:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/243dfd4ab25a2779
Cheers,
S
I was thinking about buying an android phone, and getting SAGE to work
was one of the questions, so can I take this opportunity to pick your
brains ?
first, how fast is SAGE on sagenb.org if you're not close to a wiki
spot and use a telephone connection of some kind ? (i know in france
they call
noufal wrote:
> i have tried the binary version of sage 4.1 in mandriva 2008 spring
> version but it is not possible to install please help me
>
I'm unlikely personally to be able to help you, but I would suggest you
give as much information as possible. Like your computer, CPU, memory,
exact o
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:06 PM, noufal wrote:
>
> Is it possible to install sage 4.1 online
I don't quite understand your question. Can you please elaborate
further on how you want to install Sage?
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post t
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:01 PM, noufal wrote:
>
> i have tried the binary version of sage 4.1 in mandriva 2008 spring
> version but it is not possible to install please help me
What's the error message you received? What's your CPU architecture?
Which binary did you use? Was it the 32-bit o
Is it possible to install sage 4.1 online
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://
i have tried the binary version of sage 4.1 in mandriva 2008 spring
version but it is not possible to install please help me
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage
> not supported in pure Python. However, it could add a lot of readability and
> programming easiness to Sage because a common task as a scientist is to
> manipulate and transform a lot of data and (I think) the most basic
> container to do that is a list.
IMHO, an expression like 1 + [2,3,4,5] i
37 matches
Mail list logo
