On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> William,
>
> I used GF(101), GF(1009), and GF(199).
>
> Jeff
In Sage, echelon form over at least the first two of these fields uses
the C++ Linbox library. That library in turn does computation of
echelon forms using a very complicated
SUCESS!! Thank you very much. I had already changed the sagetex.sty
file in my texmf. It had the one that comes with TeXLive, and I put
there the one that comes with Sage, since I noticed it was more
recent. That didn't seem to help, but I just did what you recommend
(sudo gzip sagetex.sty and then
William,
I used GF(101), GF(1009), and GF(199).
Jeff
On Feb 14, 5:21 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> > Everyone,
>
> > I'm wondering if there's an easy way to count the number of operations
> > performed when row-reducing a matrix, and al
William,
I used GF(101), GF(1009), and GF(199).
Jeff
On Feb 14, 5:21 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> > Everyone,
>
> > I'm wondering if there's an easy way to count the number of operations
> > performed when row-reducing a matrix, and al
Apparently, I'm not afraid to ask silly questions...
First, if someone can tell how to find out the answers by myself to some of the
kinds of questions I'm asking, please let me know.
1. Is there a way around Sage's dislike for things like sin^2(x)+cos^2(x)?
This doesn't bother me at all, but
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Dana Ernst wrote:
> What's the easiest way to display unparsed text in an html cell in the Sage
> notebook? I'd like to be able to display what one would type into a Sage
> cell and occasionally some LaTeX syntax. Another way of asking this is
> what's the equ
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 at 12:26PM -0800, Oscar wrote:
> The story gets more complicated: I commented out the \sage{2^100}
> calculation, and without that, it runs fine.
The reason is a change in sagetex.sty. Right now, your system is using
sagetex.sty from TeXLive (look for
"/usr/local/texlive/2009/t
What's the easiest way to display unparsed text in an html cell in the Sage
notebook? I'd like to be able to display what one would type into a Sage cell
and occasionally some LaTeX syntax. Another way of asking this is what's the
equivalent of the \verb command in LaTeX? I have been just put
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Stroomer wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I'm wondering if there's an easy way to count the number of operations
> performed when row-reducing a matrix, and also when reducing
> polynomials using elements of a Groebner basis. Here are the details.
>
> I am comparing th
Everyone,
I'm wondering if there's an easy way to count the number of operations
performed when row-reducing a matrix, and also when reducing
polynomials using elements of a Groebner basis. Here are the details.
I am comparing the run times of a couple algorithms for computing
zero-dimensional
Robert Veelenturf wrote:
On Feb 12, 3:11 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
On 12 February 2010 18:12, Robert Veelenturf wrote:
Hello,
I was unable to run the Live CD version of Sage (sage42lwlcd.iso, using a
flash drive) on two different machines, one of them less than a year old.
It has not been test
On Feb 12, 3:11 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 12 February 2010 18:12, Robert Veelenturf wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I was unable to run the Live CD version of Sage (sage42lwlcd.iso, using a
> > flash drive) on two different machines, one of them less than a year old.
>
> > It has not been tested ade
The story gets more complicated: I commented out the \sage{2^100}
calculation, and without that, it runs fine.
This seems to have no problems:
%!TEX TS-program = sage
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{sagetex}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
This is an example
I did change the drop-down menu so that it says 'sage'. I did
'kpsewhich sagetex.sty' and this is what I got:
Cnidus:~ oscar$ kpsewhich sagetex.sty
/Users/oscar/Library/texmf/tex/sagetex.sty
The whole console text is at
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3709792/sagetex_example_console.txt
You'll see that
On Feb 14, 12:47 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> As a longer term solution, would it not be worth having code in Sage
> which checks if the current date is more than X months since the Sage
> release date, and if so gives a warning like...
My idea for that was to check this website:
http://www.sagemath
On 14 February 2010 09:46, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:07:47 +1100
> Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:27:22 -0800 (PST), Tom Roche
>> wrote:
>> > summary: I installed ubuntu package=sagemath (and dependencies)
>> > using aptitude on 2 previously-sage-clean ubuntu
On Feb 14, 10:46 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Can we get Debian/Ubuntu to move these packages to a less visible
> repository...
I already complained rather long ago, it's just that they have pulled
experimental packages into the multiverse repository or something like
that. I hope it will drop out
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:07:47 +1100
Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:27:22 -0800 (PST), Tom Roche
> wrote:
> > summary: I installed ubuntu package=sagemath (and dependencies)
> > using aptitude on 2 previously-sage-clean ubuntu karmic boxes. Sage
> > appeared to install cleanly on both
18 matches
Mail list logo
