I am having difficulty in simplifying certain symbolc expressions in
Sage. As I do not have much experience with this side of Sage it is
possible that there are some tricks I am missing. Here are two
examples:
1. It is a fact that if a^2+b^2=1 then arcsin(a)+arcsin(b)=pi/2, but
how can I get
The patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15422 is now ready for review.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
The problem is indeed fixed by applying #13951 (which still needs
reviewing).
Peter
Op vrijdag 8 november 2013 17:35:01 UTC schreef John Cremona:
On 8 November 2013 16:11, Georgi Guninski guni...@guninski.comjavascript:
wrote:
I am not an expert, but is it normal to get negative
The results of all GP command are stored in an array named 'sage' inside
GP. If you execute too many commands, this array apparently isn't enlarged
anymore. I suspect that this is because GP runs out of stack space and
that Sage's GP interface does not notice this.
I don't see a quick and
On Friday, November 22, 2013 10:26:52 AM UTC-8, Peter Bruin wrote:
The results of all GP command are stored in an array named 'sage' inside
GP. If you execute too many commands, this array apparently isn't enlarged
anymore. I suspect that this is because GP runs out of stack space and
Op vrijdag 22 november 2013 18:48:27 UTC schreef Nils Bruin:
On Friday, November 22, 2013 10:26:52 AM UTC-8, Peter Bruin wrote:
The results of all GP command are stored in an array named 'sage' inside
GP. If you execute too many commands, this array apparently isn't enlarged
anymore. I
To partially solve the above bug, we should make sure doubling of the
sage array works when an allocatemem() has to be done; this seems to be
broken, and I just opened a ticket for it (#15446). It is only a partial
fix because doing GP calculations still leaks memory.
I also opened
On 22 November 2013 17:46, Peter Bruin pjbr...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is indeed fixed by applying #13951 (which still needs
reviewing).
As Peter and I are both already authors and reviewers of the patcheson
that ticket, we should probably find a third party to finish the
review.
John
On 2013-11-22 20:52, John Cremona wrote:
On 22 November 2013 17:46, Peter Bruin pjbr...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is indeed fixed by applying #13951 (which still needs
reviewing).
As Peter and I are both already authors and reviewers of the patcheson
that ticket, we should probably find a
