Hi Nils,
On Wednesday 07 May 2014 16:43:03 Nils Bruin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 9:58:48 AM UTC-7, François Colas wrote:
What I want to do is a way to evaluate polynomials of K in a power of a
primitive square root of unity:
omega = CC(e^(2*I*pi/m))
F = Hom(K, CC)
f =
Hi Martin,
danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. So wie es scheint basiert der Test auf
DDF, was vermutlich langsamer ist im Vergleich zu Rabins Test wenn grad(f)
= p = prim. Im allgemeinen Fall aber die schnellere Variante.
Danke nochmal,
viele Grüße
Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 15:35:45 UTC+2
Is possible that after user action on interaction control X the function
that updates
the interact screen could also update the X control possible values ?
Thank you,
Pedro
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 12:01:23 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Pedro Cruz
pedrocr...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Is possible that after user action on interaction control X the function
that updates
the interact screen could also update the X control
Hi there,
I think I may have found a bug in the class hmm.DiscreteHiddenMarkovModel.
The repro is below. It probably has something to do with one emission
value being much more common than the others, but that shouldn't be invalid
from my understanding of HMMs.
I am running Sage Version
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Jesse Hersch jesseher...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi there,
I think I may have found a bug in the class hmm.DiscreteHiddenMarkovModel.
The repro is below. It probably has something to do with one emission value
being much more common than the others, but that
Hi kcrisman and sage community!
I've just reported this issue at
https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/issues/444
Best regards,
-- Share_The_Sage!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-support group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:14:32 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
I could be wrong, but I don't think the implementation of Baum-Welch
is wrong. The BM algorithm [1] using double precision numbers (which
is all the HMM algorithm in Sage uses) can lead to overflow, given the
sort of computations
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jesse Hersch jesseher...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:14:32 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
I could be wrong, but I don't think the implementation of Baum-Welch
is wrong. The BM algorithm [1] using double precision numbers (which
is all the HMM
