On Friday, May 9, 2014 1:05:23 PM UTC-7, Jason Grout wrote:
> Right---the interact always is recreating that control, which defaults
> to the first entry. With a selector, our thinking was that if the item
> was already selected, then it didn't need to be selected again.
But I can see where i
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Jesse Hersch wrote:
> On Thursday, May 8, 2014 5:59:10 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
>>
>> > Do you recall if you handled the underflow problem in your
>> > implementation?
>>
>> I believe it does not.
>>
>> > I haven't studied the code yet, but it seems like this could
On 5/9/14, 11:14, Nils Bruin wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thank you very much for all the work on SageCell. It's an unbelievably
useful tool to make little demonstrations.
On Friday, May 9, 2014 6:11:24 AM UTC-7, Jason Grout wrote:
4. When you click on a selector button that is already selected, the
Jesse Hersch wrote:
What is the usual way sage developers go about making changes in cython
code without rebuilding everything?
Edit the file(s), then run './sage -b' (which only rebuilds the
necessary files of the Sage library).
'./sage -br' rebuilds the library and afterwards starts Sage,
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 5:59:10 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
> > Do you recall if you handled the underflow problem in your
> implementation?
>
> I believe it does not.
>
> > I haven't studied the code yet, but it seems like this could be the
> culprit.
>
> I think you're right. You should impl
Hi Jason,
Thank you very much for all the work on SageCell. It's an unbelievably
useful tool to make little demonstrations.
On Friday, May 9, 2014 6:11:24 AM UTC-7, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> 4. When you click on a selector button that is already selected, the
> cell server ignores the click (since
I have forwarded your posting to sage-nt which has readers who may help who
don't follow sage-support. You are welcome to join sage-nt (for which I am
a moderator so if I see your name I'll let you in!)
Sorry not to have actually helped answer your question!
John Cremona
On 9 May 2014 13:30, Y
It is quite likely that the implementation of Jacobian for plane cubics
does not work in characteristic 3 (at least in general). I had something
to do with early implementations but then it was all rewritten in terms of
Jacobians, so I cannot remember the details. Perhaps Volker Braun can
comment
On 5/8/14, 11:01, William Stein wrote:
@interact
def foo(functions=[sin(x)], f=sin(x)):
show(plot(foo.functions))
del foo.functions
foo.functions = [f(x=x), f(x=x^2), f(x=x^3)]
Here's a corresponding one working in the cell server:
http://sagecell.sagemath.org/?q=ribyjg
@inter
Hello all,
I am looking for a way to determine if an embedding $\sigma$ of a number
field $L$ into the complex numbers restricts to a given embedding $\tau$ of
a subfield $K$ (asking for equality between $\tau$ and $\sigma \circ i$
where $i$ is the embedding of $K$ into $L$ does not work).
Mor
That's exactly what I wanted to do
f = F([omega],check=False)
Thank you :)
Le jeudi 8 mai 2014 08:16:41 UTC+2, Martin Albrecht a écrit :
>
> Hi Nils,
>
> On Wednesday 07 May 2014 16:43:03 Nils Bruin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 9:58:48 AM UTC-7, François Colas wrote:
> > > What I want
I'd like to create an elliptic curve from a degree 3 polynomial without a
base point, but when I use the Jacobian method I get a "division by zero"
error.
This is my data:
A=GF(3^2,'c')
S.=A[]
gS=a^3 - a^2*b + b^3 - a^2*c - a*b*c + b^2*c + a*c^2 + b*c^2 + c^3
Jacobian(gS)
My intuition is that
Michael Hind wrote:
Hi,
I just built Sage 6.2 from source (ex .git) and it brings in GAP 4.7.4.
Now the sage --optional lists
...
database_gap-4.6.4 .. not installed
...
gap_packages-4.6.4.p1 ... not installed
...
I am not too happy about installing these
I
Hi,
I just built Sage 6.2 from source (ex .git) and it brings in GAP 4.7.4.
Now the sage --optional lists
...
database_gap-4.6.4 .. not installed
...
gap_packages-4.6.4.p1 ... not installed
...
I am not too happy about installing these
I already have GAP 4.7.
14 matches
Mail list logo
