Re: [sage-support] Why inequalities are not converted to boolean?

Relevant ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17700 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to thi

[sage-support] Re: CBLAS not found: error installing iml-1.0.4p1

I’ve tried all of those ideas, and none of them have worked. I have also found this discussion and tried some of its suggestions. ​ >> > ​ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

[sage-support] Re: CBLAS not found: error installing iml-1.0.4p1

I also have one more idea: I have located the file that is running and raising the error, and it seems that the configure script for iml is not receiving the correct arguments. I am backing up my current partial installation and then am going to try modifying that file. -- You received this me

[sage-support] Re: CBLAS not found: error installing iml-1.0.4p1

It still doesn’t work. I have also tried changing SAGE_ATLAS_LIB to /usr/lib. There are three possibilities I can think of: (1) the preprocessor can’t find the header files, (2) there is a permissions issue preventing the compiler from accessing the library files, or (3) the compiler is not f

[sage-support] Re: CBLAS not found: error installing iml-1.0.4p1

I installed `libatlas-dev` when I installed ATLAS (line 230 of `pkgs.log`). I also just noticed a missing backslash in my environment variables. That could be the problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from thi

[sage-support] Re: CBLAS not found: error installing iml-1.0.4p1

I installed `libatlas-dev` when I installed ATLAS (line 230 of `pkgs.log`). I also just noticed a missing backslash in my environment variables. That could be the problem. On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 1:37:47 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 2 April 2015 09:01:00 UTC+1, Cale

[sage-support] symbolic bitwise

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, is there a library to do some symbolic calculations over integer but with bitwise operations ? I need to work on symbolic polynomials mixing arithmetic + and * and bitwise >> << & | ^ . Thanks, - -- Guillaume Connan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [sage-support] power series algebraic over field of rational fractions

Sorry, I misunderstood your question which is harder (and more interesting!) than I thought. I hope there will be some creative suggestions. John On 2 April 2015 at 17:22, Pierre wrote: > PS sorry i wrote > >> to be clear : i know there is at least a relation >> >> P_0(x) + P_1(x) f + P_2(x) f^

Re: [sage-support] power series algebraic over field of rational fractions

PS sorry i wrote to be clear : i know there is at least a relation > > P_0(x) + P_1(x) f + P_2(x) f^2 + ... + P_d(x) f^d > i meant to end with " = 0 ". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop r

Re: [sage-support] power series algebraic over field of rational fractions

> Given a degree bound d in y, you are looking for a linear relation > between 1, f, f^2, ..., f^d, which you could find using linear > algebra over K after making sure that you have at least d+1 > I'm looking for a linear relation with coefficients in K(x), so you probably mean linear alge

Re: [sage-support] power series algebraic over field of rational fractions

On 2 April 2015 at 16:13, Pierre wrote: > Hi, > > I have a power series f in K[[x]] where K is a finite field, and I know that > it is algebraic over K(x). I'm looking for an explicit polynomial P in K[x, > y] such that P(x, f) = 0. I can figure out a bound for the degree of P in y, > in my exampl

[sage-support] power series algebraic over field of rational fractions

Hi, I have a power series f in K[[x]] where K is a finite field, and I know that it is algebraic over K(x). I'm looking for an explicit polynomial P in K[x, y] such that P(x, f) = 0. I can figure out a bound for the degree of P in y, in my example (though not in x). Given this post https://g

Re: [sage-support] Re: Whats wrong with my function syntax?

Its of course a quite difficult machine learning exercise to find the optimal match from tracebacks to hints that are helpful to a beginner. Though deciding based on a regex on the input and traceback is probably a good start. On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 4:16:39 PM UTC+2, William wrote: >

Re: [sage-support] Re: Whats wrong with my function syntax?

On 2015-04-02 16:02, kcrisman wrote: We could translate en dash into hypen on the commandline to avoid that surprise... Interesting idea, though what if it was intended in something, such as a plot legend? The preparser never changes strings, so that's not an issue. -- You received t

Re: [sage-support] Re: Whats wrong with my function syntax?

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> >> We could translate en dash into hypen on the commandline to avoid that >> surprise... > > > Interesting idea, though what if it was intended in something, such as a > plot legend? > Another idea would be to do something only if an exception is

[sage-support] Re: Whats wrong with my function syntax?

> > > We could translate en dash into hypen on the commandline to avoid that > surprise... > Interesting idea, though what if it was intended in something, such as a plot legend? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscrib

[sage-support] Re: CBLAS not found: error installing iml-1.0.4p1

On Thursday, 2 April 2015 09:01:00 UTC+1, Caleb Reister wrote: > > Context > > I am wanting to build a calculator similar in form to the TI-92 > using a Raspberry Pi Model B > . Its most popular, Raspbian