[sage-support] amsrefs citation for SageMath

2017-07-27 Thread Abhishek Parab
I have used SageMath in my thesis (via CoCalc) and would like to cite it. Since I have been using "amsrefs" for citation, I would like to get a code for the same. The webpage "https://wiki.sagemath.org/Publications_using_SageMath; doesn't provide the code for "amsrefs". -- You received this

[sage-support] Re: Sage crash report

2017-07-27 Thread Silvio Reyes
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 2:14:17 PM UTC-5, leonel torres salinas wrote: > > Hello, i just wanted to try Sagemath in my computer > > Toshiba satellite l745d runing Fedora 25 with LXDE desktop > > I tried to execute it from the binaries but it wasn't enough for it > > Thank you for the

[sage-support] Re: FInd all paths of given length n

2017-07-27 Thread fidelbc
Not directly, but it shouldn't be hard to just keep track of which vertex sets you have seen so far. Eg. seen = {} for p in g.subgraph_search_iterator(graphs.PathGraph(3, induced=True)): vxs = tuple(sorted(p)) if vxs not in seen: seen[vxs]=True print vxs Note that you

[sage-support] Re: FInd all paths of given length n

2017-07-27 Thread Selvaraja S
Thanks for the response. sage: g=Graph(d) sage: for p in g.subgraph_search_iterator(graphs.PathGraph(3)): print(p) This is giving the all the paths of length 3. But I have one more question. Suppose $xyz$ is induced path of length 3. Note that $zyx$ is also induced path of length. Can I

[sage-support] Re: FInd all paths of given length n

2017-07-27 Thread fidelbc
Yes we can. Suppose the path has length k and thus k+1 vertices. Then the following command returns an iterator over all lists of vertices that induce paths on k+1 vertices in G. G.subgraph_search_iterator(graphs.PathGraph(k+1),induced=True) More on this may be found at [1]. [1];