Re: [sage-support] log to the base 2

2020-07-18 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
On Jul 18, Michael Beeson wrote: sage: n(log(2,408/370)) 7.08999206263157 sage: log(2,2) 1 sage: 2^7 128 sage: n(log(2,408.0/370)) 7.08999206263157 sage: version() 'SageMath version 8.7, Release Date: 2019-03-23' sage: n(log(2,1.001)) 693.493696416899 sage:log(2,1)  gives an error

[sage-support] Re: log to the base 2

2020-07-18 Thread Michael Beeson
And also sage: log(*2*,x) log(2)/log(x) which goes a long ways to explain the previous results. So log(2,x) is not actually log to the base 2 of x. On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 11:45:06 AM UTC-7, Michael Beeson wrote: > > sage: n(log(*2*,*408*/*370*)) > > 7.08999206263157 > > sage:

[sage-support] log to the base 2

2020-07-18 Thread Michael Beeson
sage: n(log(*2*,*408*/*370*)) 7.08999206263157 sage: log(*2*,*2*) 1 sage: *2*^*7* 128 sage: n(log(*2*,*408.0*/*370*)) 7.08999206263157 sage: version() 'SageMath version 8.7, Release Date: 2019-03-23' sage: n(log(*2*,*1.001*)) 693.493696416899 sage:log(2,1) gives an error instead of