Re: [sage-support] Re: Cartan moving frame formalism

2018-12-10 Thread Tevian Dray
Let me start by confirming that I have successfully used SageManifolds to implement the several calculations I wanted to make using the Cartan moving frames formalism. So first a big "thank you" for developing this code! > If you find some missing functionalities and you would like to >

Re: [sage-support] Re: Cartan moving frame formalism

2018-12-07 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le jeudi 6 décembre 2018 17:28:39 UTC+1, Tevian Dray a écrit : > > >> The answer to your question is essentially "yes" ... > > Thank you for your detailed response and links. I had in fact found > some of them when searching, but clearly hadn't read them carefully > enough. In particular, I

Re: [sage-support] Re: Cartan moving frame formalism

2018-12-06 Thread Tevian Dray
>> The answer to your question is essentially "yes" ... Thank you for your detailed response and links. I had in fact found some of them when searching, but clearly hadn't read them carefully enough. In particular, I had missed the use of vector_frame in the documentation of Affine Connections,