On Mar 4, 1:30 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 4, 1:12 am, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Isn't this the same problem as 2358? Same source probably.
>
> > > -M.Ham
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 4, 1:12 am, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Isn't this the same problem as 2358? Same source probably.
> >
> > -M.Hampton
>
> Hi Marshall,
>
> it is either tightly related or the same
On Mar 4, 1:12 am, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't this the same problem as 2358? Same source probably.
>
> -M.Hampton
Hi Marshall,
it is either tightly related or the same issue. So far no one seems to
have taken a serious stab at this [AFAIK].
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~--
Isn't this the same problem as 2358? Same source probably.
-M.Hampton
On Mar 3, 6:04 am, "Michael Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:18 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > Hi:
> > I'm wondering if the following possible error (in 2.10.3
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:18 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> Hi:
> I'm wondering if the following possible error (in 2.10.3.rc0) is already
> known,
> or if I'm just doing something stupid:
>
it is already known, but not fixed as far as I know. There is no track
tick
