Le mardi 21 avril 2020 18:59:01 UTC+2, Santanu a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
> I am trying to install Sage 9.0. But I am getting error.
> I have upgraded from Ubuntu 14.04 to Ubuntu 18.04.
> I am getting this:
>
> (base)
> santanu@Santanu-Laptop:~/Documents/sage-9.0-Ubuntu_18.04-i686/SageMath$
OK guys
so to be more specific, I had my problem when i wanted to make an install
with downloading the .app.dmg file
i deleted that install, and reinstalled with the .dmg file only
i do get a terminal opened when double clicking on the sage icon, i typed
in notebook() and Sage DOES open in
hi volker
i'm a total noob in MacOS i bought my first Mac days ago. i was running
Windows prior to that (and managed to install SAGE for Windows)
i open the terminal but /path/to/SageMath.app/Contents/Resources/sage/sage
doesn't work
maybe you want me to specify the exact path instead of
What happens if you try to run it by hand? In a terminal:
/path/to/SageMath.app/Contents/Resources/sage/sage
On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 7:31:28 PM UTC+2, FG R wrote:
>
> I’ve installed SAGE on my brand new iMac Retina running on OS X El Capitan
> 10.11.3
> after downloading the file
>
>
Do you have SAGE_ROOT set permanently
to Users/echolalie/Desktop/Sage-6.9.app for some reason? E.g. ~/.bashrc
~/.bash_profile, ...,
Also, the "-bash: PS1: command not found" is suspicious. Not a Sage
problem, but most likely an issue with your init files. What is $PS1?
On Thursday, March
I faced the same problem when installing sage on a different computer and
then copying my .sage folder from my original computer across. First I had
a permission problem and when fixing this by chown -R newuser .sage, I got
the Errno 39 as above. I found out that some symlinks didn't copy
On 2012-12-10, Emmanuel emm.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
--=_Part_20_25716954.1355143287028
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Good afternoon,
Havin installed sage 5.4 on my Ubuntu distribution 12.10, I have no problem
to run sage in a terminal. However, I can no more run it on my
PS:
sage-4.5.3 seems to be fine on my machine. I'm now trying to upgrade.
There is one detail that may be relevant: While I tried to build
sage-4.6, the computer crashed. Later, I typed make again, in order
to complete the build process. Perhaps this is then things went wrong.
Best regards,
The 'readline hell' part is an annoying openSUSE problem. If you see
the file spkg-install of the package readline, you will find that
there is a provision for trying to recognize the system's readline
package. But this is only useful for some versions of openSUSE. For
example readline in
Hello Dan
thanks for this. I suppose dependency isn't quite the right word here.
The error message below is cut-and-pasted from the output of 'make';
at one point it asks me to email sage-devel, but perhaps this list
is better for now!
best wishes
Robin
Host system
uname -a:
Linux le112
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 at 08:40AM +0100, robin hankin wrote:
thanks for this. I suppose dependency isn't quite the right word here.
The error message below is cut-and-pasted from the output of 'make';
at one point it asks me to email sage-devel, but perhaps this list
is better for now!
Ah, I
Your error message looks exactly like the one reported here a few
months ago:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/aba48495d9c09e03/f25d062b6764492f
In that case it was somehow caused by an upgrade after installing the
binary. One option would be to install a source
Thanks for this Marshall.
I did try to compile my own, but ran in to utter dependency hell.
In the end I managed to get it to work by deleting some of the
readline libraries, but I don't understand why that worked.
Would you say that the google groups you point me towards
is a more active forum
On 09/16/10 07:43 PM, robin hankin wrote:
Thanks for this Marshall.
I did try to compile my own, but ran in to utter dependency hell.
In the end I managed to get it to work by deleting some of the
readline libraries, but I don't understand why that worked.
Redline often causes problems on
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 at 07:43PM +0100, robin hankin wrote:
I did try to compile my own, but ran in to utter dependency hell.
The Sage source should include very nearly everything it needs to build.
There are very few dependencies. What kind of dependency hell did you
run into?
Dan
--
--- Dan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:10 AM, mathieu mathieu.dut...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I experienced program installing version 3.4 of sage.
The system is linux Fedora 8.
Post a link to the *complete* log.
Which gcc version?
gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)
Precisely
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Mathieu Dutour mathieu.dut...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:10 AM, mathieu mathieu.dut...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I experienced program installing version 3.4 of sage.
The system is linux Fedora 8.
Post a link to the *complete* log.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Mathieu Dutour mathieu.dut...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:10 AM, mathieu mathieu.dut...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear all,
I experienced program installing version 3.4 of sage.
The system is linux Fedora 8.
Post a link to the
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:10 AM, mathieu mathieu.dut...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I experienced program installing version 3.4 of sage.
The system is linux Fedora 8.
Post a link to the *complete* log.
Which gcc version?
Precisely which sage tarball (sage-3.4.tar I guess)?
Precisely what
On 8/27/07, John P. Burkett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] Working on a Dell 390n (x86_64 architecture) running Red Hat Enterprise
Linux version 4, I have been trying to install Sage from
sage-2.8.2-debian64-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz, following instructions in the
Installation Guide (release
20 matches
Mail list logo
