I had it turned on but I guess it doesn't get triggered for x (x -1).
Any way to change the behavior or
does that require a patch to Sage?
On Dec 15, 1:37 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 12/15/11 1:31 AM, Chris Seberino wrote:
I know Sage has some issues with a variable
On Dec 15, 2:26 pm, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote:
I had it turned on but I guess it doesn't get triggered for x (x -1).
Even when you turn it on, the behavior is not uniform as the user
might expect, though there is a logic.
sage: implicit_multiplication(10)
sage: (x) (x-1)
(x -
On Dec 15, 11:26 am, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote:
I had it turned on but I guess it doesn't get triggered for x (x -1).
Any way to change the behavior or
does that require a patch to Sage?
You've already discussed that:
On 12/15/11 1:31 AM, Chris Seberino wrote:
I know Sage has some issues with a variable in front of parens when
using implicit multiplication. Why did that make the first give the
wrong answer when using implicit multiplication? How is sage
interpreting it?
sage: solve(3 + x (x-1)==5,x)
[x ==
