If anything, we've probably been too cavalier with our use of Maxima's
fine-grained simplification and other routines at times; it seems
dangerous to go the other way.
At the same time, we have
sage: integrate(x^n,x,algorithm='sympy')
x^(n + 1)/(n + 1)
OK, this is a lot more usable,
By the way, sympy seems to be a lot faster than maxima. Is there any
It shouldn't be too much faster once Maxima is started up - the first
integral will be longer because the Maxima library has to initialize,
but after that it should be quite fast.But I haven't done any
timings.
reason
On Monday, November 28, 2011 10:01:54 AM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote:
By the way, sympy seems to be a lot faster than maxima. Is there any
It shouldn't be too much faster once Maxima is started up - the first
integral will be longer because the Maxima library has to initialize,
but after that
On Nov 27, 2:16 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's this in Sage. See the end of this post for a solution you
might like better than the ramblings in between :)
--
| Sage Version 4.7.2, Release Date: 2011-10-29
Here's this in Sage. See the end of this post for a solution you
might like better than the ramblings in between :)
--
| Sage Version 4.7.2, Release Date: 2011-10-29 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and
