[sage-support] Re: gmp build fail on fedora 9

2008-06-23 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 23, 10:08 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Heh, we do provide a version of Sage without any >> bundled dependencies: >> >> http://sagemath.org/packages/standard/sage-3.0.3.spkg >> >> (The spkg is just a

[sage-support] Re: gmp build fail on fedora 9

2008-06-23 Thread Rex
On Jun 23, 10:08 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh, we do provide a version of Sage without any > bundled dependencies: > > http://sagemath.org/packages/standard/sage-3.0.3.spkg > > (The spkg is just a tar.bz2.) Just extract the above, > get all 70-80 dependencies installed,

[sage-support] Re: gmp build fail on fedora 9

2008-06-23 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 21, 9:35 pm, dbk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm getting a strange configure problem building 3.02 on fedora 9 > > One unfortunate side effect of bundling dependencies instead of > allowing the > use those provided by the

[sage-support] Re: gmp build fail on fedora 9

2008-06-23 Thread Rex
On Jun 21, 9:35 pm, dbk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting a strange configure problem building 3.02 on fedora 9 One unfortunate side effect of bundling dependencies instead of allowing the use those provided by the host os/system. hint hint, grumble, grumble. -- Rex --~--~-~--~-

[sage-support] Re: gmp build fail on fedora 9

2008-06-21 Thread dbk
Hi Michael, Thanks for the discussion link. I'll play around a little with the patch and see if I can do anything with config.guess. Looks like a pretty tricky build! If I come up with anything useful I'll be sure to let you know. Take care -Don --~--~-~--~~~---~--~

[sage-support] Re: gmp build fail on fedora 9

2008-06-21 Thread mabshoff
On Jun 21, 7:35 pm, dbk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, Hi Don, > I'm getting a strange configure problem building 3.02 on fedora 9 > running on X86_64 system; The problem is not FC9 specific, see below for more info. > First I get; >