Dear William,
On Feb 20, 9:47 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 12:30 PM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Would it be a reasonable idea to implement such method, so that
copy(R)
yields a ring that is isomorphic with R but has different variable
names
Dear William,
On Feb 22, 1:58 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I rename it to tensor.sage (not sure if this is a good idea),
Yes, that's a VERY GOOD idea. It's really crazy to use a compiled
spyx for the purposes of interfacing with the Singular interpreter
via pexpect.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Simon King
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William,
On Feb 22, 1:58 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I rename it to tensor.sage (not sure if this is a good idea),
Yes, that's a VERY GOOD idea. It's really crazy to use a compiled
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:03 AM, John Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 22, 8:47 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Simon King
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William,
On Feb 22, 1:58 am, William Stein [EMAIL
Dear John,
a brief addendum to a previous post of yours:
On Feb 20, 10:22 pm, John Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is the following a bug?
sage: singular.LIB('ncall.lib')
sage: R=singular.ring(0,'(x1,x12,x2)','dp')
sage: C=singular.matrix(3,3,'1,-1,-1, -1,1,-1, -1,-1,1')
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:50 PM, John Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 21, 2:18 am, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear John,
i think i figured out how to form a tensor product of several copies
of a (non-commutative) ring with itself...
On Feb 20, 9:47 pm,
On Feb 21, 2:18 am, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear John,
i think i figured out how to form a tensor product of several copies
of a (non-commutative) ring with itself...
On Feb 20, 9:47 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip No, that would not be reasonable. [[woah,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:22 PM, John Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is the following a bug?
sage: singular.LIB('ncall.lib')
sage: R=singular.ring(0,'(x1,x12,x2)','dp')
sage: C=singular.matrix(3,3,'1,-1,-1, -1,1,-1, -1,-1,1')
sage: C
1, -1,-1,
-1,1, -1,
-1,-1,1
Dear John, dear William,
On Feb 20, 11:45 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:22 PM, John Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is the following a bug?
sage: singular.LIB('ncall.lib')
sage: R=singular.ring(0,'(x1,x12,x2)','dp')
sage:
