Re: [sage-support] question about radical

Hi, On Aug 17, 2011, at 00:20 , pong wrote: > [radical(k) for k in [1..30]] produces the expected list however > > [radical(k) for k in range(1,31)] rises an error > > AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'factor' The problem here is the distinction between Python 'int's and Sage 'Int

[sage-support] question about radical

Hum... [radical(k) for k in [1..30]] produces the expected list however [radical(k) for k in range(1,31)] rises an error AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'factor' Wouldn't it be nice if the 2nd comprehension also give the desire list? Any reason why shouldn't SAGE take that? --