RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

sure, send it along...    actually, I was kinda thinking that I'd have to use a "negative" check, but you guys have me rethinking this...  wonder if the anti-virus agents start before logon?  Like Norton or InnoculateIt? I know on slower servers I often see the real-time portion taking a while af

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

O!  Even better.  Good one.   Brent Ozar - UniFocus "All of a sudden you're a black man, then you're Diana Ross,  now you're Audrey Hepburn.  Then he's got the little beard  going on.  He's like Lord of the Rings, the e

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

I wrote a little VB app that is a run-time clock. Displays in the task bar the up time since launch. If you're interested I'll shoot you the code and/or app. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/21/03 03:03PM >>> So what you'd probably want to do is to put something like "Iexplore.exe" in the Startup folde

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

Interesting thought.. .I'll try that.     Thanks! Greg This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in deliver

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

So what you'd probably want to do is to put something like "Iexplore.exe" in the Startup folder in each machine's All Users program groups.  Iexplore.exe doesn't start by itself under normal circumstances, and that'd be a way for you to verify that someone is logged into the machine.  Of co

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

Our prod servers must be physically logged in... we have the registry set to clear the last used userid and such these are all servers,  NT 4.0 & Win2K. Our security gestapo have an issue with auto-logged in servers...  guess I do too...   Greg "Brent G. Ozar" @brentozar.com> Sent

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

Would you please?  I'd love to see it Thanks!! Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of t

RE: [SA-list] Message in log that is not correct?

Title: Message To be honest you're "using" a bug of SA :-)   Normaly what should happen is that IF you configure authentication to be used before doing a shutdown, is that SA tries to authenticated and IF this fails it should NOT do the shutdown.  And due to a bug in teh current SA it still

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

Do a process check for explorer.exe.  That shouldn't get launched until someone logs in. Mark BradshawSalem Web Network[EMAIL PROTECTED]9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300Chesterfield, VA 23832804.768.9404 x123 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

Title: Message I have a script I use for displaying the logged on user of a particular server or PC.  You could modify its code to be an external check and then use that in ServersAlive.  I can send it to you off-list if you wish.     Marcus L. Farmer Systems/Network Manager Metron North Am

RE: [SA-list] New type of check?

What do you mean by "logged in"?  Is this a server OS, or a workstation OS?  Does a user have to physically log in, or is it using a TweakUI-style utility to automatically log in a user?       Brent Ozar - UniFocus "All of a

Re: [SA-list] Message in log that is not correct?

Title: Message 4.0.1545   Randy - Original Message - From: Dirk Bulinckx To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Message in log that is not correct? What version of SA?     dirk. -Origin

[SA-list] New type of check?

I'm looking for a way to check to see if a server is up but not logged in...  long story, don't ask! I want to use PING as my "depends on" check, as the IPSTACK will answer pretty early in the boot process, but I can't figure out what to use to tell that the box is up but not logged in. Thought

RE: [SA-list] Message in log that is not correct?

Title: Message What version of SA?     dirk. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy FullerSent: 21 November, 2003 7:08 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SA-list] Message in log that is not correct? I have a check that wh

[SA-list] Message in log that is not correct?

I have a check that when it fails, it sends a Reboot command.  The reboot works fine, but I just noticed that in the log file, I see the following entry:   Friday, November 21, 2003 12:01:18 PM Sending reboot command to 128.1.27.83Friday, November 21, 2003 12:01:18 PM ERR: connect to host fa

[SA-list] SNMP SET as alert

Anybody in need of the SNMP SET alert supporting SNMPv2? If so contact me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. dirk. To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive