On 6/20/07 17:05, "Kevin Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:20:25 -0500
>> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
>> From: Kevin Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: How to check process on winxp machine
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am having trouble checking the process on a win xp
I was refering to Jason Passow's response earlier, which was refering to these
reg keys:
See pg. 324 of the manual - HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\DBU
Consulting\ServersAlive\ExcludeDateTimeInMail
pg. 329 - HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\DBU
Consulting\ServersAlive\SMTP\AlternateFooter
pg. 330 -
Check the manual for removing that from the bottom of emails.
Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104
"If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything at all."
Rick Fogarty wrote:
RegKey? Haven’t heard of that one
RegKey? Haven’t heard of that one…
From: Michael Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:11 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Diagnostic help
We've seen that same issue (messages being split) here, when the text message
was sent
Strange as other text messages come in fine…. Do we always need to add
the Woodstone’s Server’s Alive… statement?
From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 9:46 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Diagnostic help
text messaging
We've seen that same issue (messages being split) here, when the text message
was sent to a cell phone, the cell service would cut messages into 120-ish
character length messages. Actual length depends on where the service finds a
space character so it doesn't split words.
So, by using the Re
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 19/06/2007 de retour le 02/07/2007.
En cas de prb technique vous pouvez contacter notre service support :
04 76 63 76 17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-t
text messaging using SMTP?
and I suppose you get the 2 messages via text messaging? The mail is send by
SA as being 1 mail, if the mailmessaging converts that to 2 messages, then I
would suggest to check with them
Dirk Bulinckx.
---
So, there is a timing issue then, no? Strange, the first two checks (using
file count) have a roundtrip time of 30-40ms – whereas the 3rd check
– which we’ve always had issues with has a roundtrip time of 344ms.
Would it be best to change the timeout portion to something else?
Alerting
 Rrdtool logging bug? I'm not sure what the salive process check returns in
the extra info field %e but you could achieve this by running a wmi script to
write to a file and have SA read the file first line.
On Error Resume Next
StrComputer = "."
Set oWmi = Getobject("winmgmts:{impersonati
So the alert didn't fire because of the number of files, but because the check
did stop within the timeout you defined for the check.
alerting type: mail (smtp) or instant messaging (icq/msn/...) or
Dirk Bulinckx.
-
I’m assuming it’s this…
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:24:36 AM External COM check (W0010,35):ERR:
didn't stop within the given timeout
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:24:37 AM Not checking host gnSQL2 because of
checking schedule
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:24:37 AM Not checking host gnSQL2 b
This is NOT the debuglogfile.
What alerting type are you usinG?
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Fogarty
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:51 PM
To
Sure. I’m using the CountFiles Check. Here is the configuration string:
Path: \\\ftproot\hcpfiles (file:///\\%3cserver%3e\ftproot\hcpfiles)
Pattern: *.zip
CountFiles > 30
Here is the log file from this morning:
HCP File Check,15,5,1,20070620,0759,20070620,0756,3
Tournamen
What type of alert are you using?
If you would have the
%a
parameter in the alert, then you would see the reason for the down too.
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
The Woodstone text can be removed see the manual for the registry entry.
What is the actual response from the check (from the logfile or %e parameter)
when you receive the supposed "false" down. There are many reasons a file
check can be down other than meeting the criteria of the check. F
Please specifiy exactly how you have the check setup, and please show us how
you currently receive the alert.
Michael D. Shook
Systems Analyst - Data Integration
Saddle Creek Corporation
863 668 4477 (work)
863 665 1261 (fax)
My time zone: UTC -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
We have several alerts for a file check. When several files (10) are listed in
a folder, it should send us an alert. We’re getting numerous false
positives and I’m not sure why. What’s the best way to diagnose
something like this?
Additionally, when we get a text for this alert, it comes i
Rrdtool logging bug?
Thanks Dirk. What I am trying to graph is the no. of instances that a process
is running (e.g. notepad open 10 times at 6pm and 25 times at 9pm). Anyone any
ideas as to how this could be achieved?
Garry.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
 Rrdtool logging bug? This is no a bug, this is normal.
The RRDTOOLs logging logs numbers only, while the result of a process check can
be the name (string), so this can't be logged.
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: S
Rrdtool logging bug?
Iâm using v6.1.2133. When I try to graph NT Process (no. of instances
running) using RRDTOOL and enable checkresult logging â nothing works (cant
CREATE and canât GRAPH). I have tested diskspace checks and NT Perfmon checks
and they work fine. Only NT Process check
21 matches
Mail list logo
