[SA-list] Servers Alive v6.2

Who here is using the new version? Has anyone noticed any issues with it? The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely fo

RE: [SA-list] Servers Alive v6.2 released

List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Servers Alive v6.2 released Yes it's newer. The change is something internal/cosmetic Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:00

RE: [SA-list] Servers Alive v6.2 released

Is the newest official 6.2 version newer than 6.2.2278 that was on the Servers Alive Beta Site? Are there any differences between the two? -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:10 AM To: Server

RE: [SA-list] New check type (combined check)

A combined checks where you can make an entry dependent on the results of two or more checks would be very helpful. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:00 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion Li

[SA-list] Does end-user have a distribution of an early 6.1 Beta Build?

I'm preferably looking for version 6.1.2212 or 6.1.2217. However, builds around 6.1.2237 would work as well. If any happens to have a copy, please email it to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]).I'll need the file renamed as salive.exz before it is emailed. Please email me

[SA-list] Wodsshd.dll crash

I upgraded to 6.1.2251 and wodsshd.dll crashed a few hours later. Suggestions? Event ID: 4097 Date: 8/16/2008 Time: 11:05:46 PM Computer: NMS4 Description: The application, C:\Program Files\Salive\serversalive.exe, generated an application error The error occurred on 08/16/2008 @ 23:05:45.46

RE: [SA-list] Issue with emailing alerts

host. It's not because something works fine at 5:40:44 and also at 5:49:51, that it also works fine at 5:41:28 Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 10:45 PM To: Servers A

[SA-list] Issue with emailing alerts

Question: If the email server is up via the checks, why would the alerting section say it's down when attempting to send an alert? Servers alive worked correctly after I rebooted the server and did chkdsk/f to fix some disk errors. Notes: - Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:40:44 PM 1

RE: [SA-list] URL & Database Checks Failed in Strange way with SA version 5.0.1728

d in Strange way with SA version 5.0.1728 I have COM checks for SQL queries loaded along with SMTP2POP testing. These have not been updated recently. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: 19 July 2007 17:01 To: Servers A

RE: [SA-list] URL & Database Checks Failed in Strange way with SA version 5.0.1728

em with v5 but upgraded to v6 to overcome an intermittent hanging issue. Since restarting the service every 48 hrs, the problem has not come back. Steve -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: 18 July 2007 21:21 To:

RE: [SA-list] URL & Database Checks Failed in Strange way with SA version 5.0.1728

my hunch is a memory leak of some description although have no proof obviously. Steve -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: 17 July 2007 17:06 To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] URL &am

RE: [SA-list] URL & Database Checks Failed in Strange way with SA version 5.0.1728

description although have no proof obviously. Steve -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: 17 July 2007 17:06 To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] URL & Database Checks Failed in Strange way

RE: [SA-list] URL & Database Checks Failed in Strange way with SA version 5.0.1728

racle check. Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:56 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] URL & Database Checks Failed in Strange way with SA ve

[SA-list] Basic Question

Title: Message Does anyone know if servers alive can "parallelize checks"?   IE. Run multiple checks at the same time rather than sequentially? The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the

[SA-list] Oracle Checks using Servers Alive

Title: Message  If an oracle check fails, it appears that servers alive hangs.   I've tried this connection with Oracle SQL Net manually and this hangs when attempting to do the check so I can see why Servers Alive might also hang because of this.   I've tried playing with the SQL Net tim

RE: [SA-list] Servers Alive Status Summary

Title: Message Does that give you the down systems as well? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:21 PMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: RE: [SA-list] Servers Alive Status Summary

RE: [SA-list] Servers Alive Status Summary

Title: Message Answer: "Down and Change".   Is there a way to get down and change with the summary line still if nothing has changed? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Friday, September 09, 2005 11:44 AMTo

[SA-list] Servers Alive Status Summary

Title: Message I noticed that if there are no changes in state and no systems down, I don't seem to get a status summary.   Is there any way around this?   I'd prefer to get a status summary once a day no matter what.   IE "Servers Alive: down: 0 - up: 423 - maintenance: 21"  The informati

RE: [SA-list] https/auth check failed after upgrade to V5

Title: Message Are you using the V5 with SR1? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:35 AMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: RE: [SA-list] https/auth check failed after upgrade to V5 A

RE: [SA-list] Status Summary Page

Title: Message It is possible to add as a feature in the next version? hehe :) -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:21 PMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: RE: [SA-list] Status Summ

[SA-list] Status Summary Page

Title: Message Is there a way to send a status summary page more than once a day without having it sent every cycle?   IE 6:00am and 6:00pm?   Tried using comma's and it didn't seem to work. The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or legally privileged infor

RE: [SA-list] SMS to cell phones

Title: Message If you dial the 800 number for voicestream TAP, it says the number is not in service.    So I guess only the email version works. IE [EMAIL PROTECTED]. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay ParasharSent: Tuesday

RE: [SA-list] SMS to cell phones

Title: Message Does T-Mobile have a TAP/SMS gateway in the united states or just the email version? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff WrightSent: Monday, March 21, 2005 1:03 PMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: RE: [SA-lis

RE: [SA-list] Using SA to check that the WebFilter is working

Title: Message We have servers alive v4.1 and surf control and I do that check via the following method.   Get the content of a site before it is blocked so I know what it looks like if it's not being blocked.   Do a URL check with Servers Alive surfing that site that is blocked but only h

[SA-list] Netegrity using Basic Authentication with URL Lookup

Anyone have any experience monitoring URL's when this product is used? I sniffed the traffic and though it's using Basic, it doesn't actually work with SA. It seems to use a large SMSESSION cookie with a large hash value. Anyways... The information contained in this email message may contain c

RE: [SA-list] W2Knews 2004 Target Awards

Congratulations! I have hp openview, ciscoworks, and servers alive but the one I could do least without is servers alive. Keep up the good work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Tue 5/18/2004 2:04 PM To: [

RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591

ftware.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 5:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591 Here is the reflection script I

RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591

p; CR ' .WaitForString LF & "" & CR & LF & LF, NEVER_TIME_OUT, rcAllowKeystrokes Exit Sub ErrorHandler: .MsgBox Err.Description, vbExclamation + vbOKOnly End With ' Recording stopped at 09:21:27.42. End Sub -Original Message- Fr

[SA-list] New Microsoft Patches

So what was the final word on the new microsoft patches for machines running Servers Alive? Are they a problem or not? To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive

RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591

Well, the problem I get is that it PERMANENTLY(until terminating the program) ends up having 99% utilization when telneting into Servers Alive:4301 using Reflection when scheduled via microsoft scheduler. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mik

RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591

The strange thing is that I could do it manually with reflection and it seemed to be ok. Might be somehow related to the scheduler+reflection scripts(vb). On the other hand, it's intermittent so it's hard to tell for sure. I'll try and test it more tommorow and see if I can get it to hang and dete

[SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591

I had a script that would log into Servers Alive at 1am and 6am via telnet 4301 and issue the start checking command. That way if someone disabled the checking because we had the network/san down but forgot to bring it back up, we'd still find out before 8am next morning. For some reason, server

RE: [SA-list] "Run-time error '13': Type mismatch"

I had some problems with my SA hanging so I upgraded to 4.1.1600. I then encountered similar problems with HTTPS and Oracle Checks using 4.1.1600 with Run time 13 Errors. I then removed the microsoft patches. and downgraded to 1591. I then retyped the passwords for HTTPS. Both HTTPS and Oracle t

RE: [SA-list] Servers ALive and latest MS patches

I suddenly started getting very interesting errors with both my HTTPS checks and my Oracle Checks when I updated two items the day before yesterday... The Microsoft Patches and SA Beta 1600. I started getting Type 13 runtime Errors when clicking on HTTPS checks and Oracle Checks. Log Showed when

[SA-list] TCP Port Connects

Is there any difference between the way that Port Connects under SA V3.X and V4.X are performed? The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). No confidentiality or privil

[SA-list] Subject Header Line - SAV4.1

I seem to be getting the message body but not the subject header intermittently when sending email/pages via SMTP in SA V4.1. I recently upgraded from 3.X and imported the hosts file. New Entries seem to work ok from what I can tell but I'm not 100% sure. And the test page seems to work ok every

RE: [SA-list] Registration code

Very handy for using on an old box with a 10 user version to monitor your main SA box and whether SA's running on it...  -Original Message-From: Jason Passow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:18 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Registrat

RE: [SA-list] Correction - Question about support

Does anyone know if SAWEB will work with version 4? -Original Message- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Correction - Question about support We will continue to support it for a while. di

RE: [SA-list] Suggestion for a V4 Feature

]On Behalf Of David Wheeler Sent: Thu Dec 26 7:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Suggestion for a V4 Feature I was thinking it'd be nice to have day of week exclusions in addition to time of day maintenance times. The reason is to be able to not monitor certain services during

[SA-list] Suggestion for a V4 Feature

I was thinking it'd be nice to have day of week exclusions in addition to time of day maintenance times. The reason is to be able to not monitor certain services during our weekly tape backup window. To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the b

RE: [SA-list] Exchange Monitoring

Title: Message I have a custom VBA one I wrote that I've lost the source code to...   It'll send a message and then check it via outlook...    It doesn't delete the messages so you have to clean out the box every 3-6 months but otherwise it works fine.   Anyways, hopefully it'll help.  Ema

RE: [SA-list] Availability reports

I believe that the same people who do SAWEB have a beta of a reporting module for servers alive. -Original Message- From: Steve Jacobsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Availability reports I've been running