RE: [SA-list] SMS to Orange UK

2003-07-01 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Title: SMS to Orange UK No subscription is necessary as far as I'm aware, it's just not the most reliable of dial-in points   -Original Message- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 10:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMS to Orange UK

RE: [SA-list] SMS to Orange UK

2003-07-01 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Title: SMS to Orange UK Hi,   I'm sending Alerts to Orange mobiles all the time from a uk location and I've found the most reliable setup to be the following:-   Comm 7E1 Baud 9600 SMSC 07958879889 Protocol TAP   I know this is going across networks but it seems to be more stable

RE: [SA-list] SA IS reliable

2003-03-21 Thread Etherington, Darrell
I think that goes for all of us, in IT rule of thumb - "Never Assume", except in SA where the assumption is Dirk is always right :) :) Keep up the good work Dirk! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 March 2003 09:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

RE: [SA-list] Good Feature Request

2003-02-28 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Dirk, I like this idea and maybe if possible a nice way to do it would be an additional level to the new tree structure you have on the main checks page? For example:- My Entries UNIX Server UXSERV1 Ping check Disc space check UXSERV2 Telnet check Ping che

RE: [SA-list] SA V4, detailed alert messages

2003-02-28 Thread Etherington, Darrell
%t %d   BUT currently if there is prettyname then %c will show the prettyname and NOT the description of the check. This will however change in the next upload.       dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Etherington

[SA-list] SA V4, detailed alert messages

2003-02-28 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Dirk,   Are there any additional variables within SA V4 that can be used to expand the detail level in the alert message other than the default %h %s etc.   For example, at the moment we get   Servername prettyname is DOWN at time date for %h %p is %s at %t %d   Can we make this

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-25 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Dirk,   Scrap that last request, we now have it working correctly, it was a further small change to the firewall to do with NAT translation that was casing the issue.  Thanks for your help so far.   Regards,   Darrell.     -Original Message- From: Etherington, Darrell

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-25 Thread Etherington, Darrell
D] Subject: RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN   What exact version of SA are you using? How did you test? Via the setup? Did you specify a"default TO" and a default message?     dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Ether

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-24 Thread Etherington, Darrell
this one?   Darrell.     -Original Message- From: Etherington, Darrell Sent: 19 February 2003 19:42 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN   Agreed, unfortunately not an option within this company but thanks anyway.   -Original Message-

RE: [SA-list] V4 - round trip stats

2003-02-21 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Dirk, I have the same results on the network here and you are correct it is not a problem, if the LAN is setup correctly and has suitably high speed switches/backbone a return of 0 ms for a ping test is perfectly normal for devices which exist on the same LAN. I did some checks to verify this and

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-21 Thread Etherington, Darrell
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etherington, Darrell Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:22 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN Dirk,   Ok, thanks for the info, this is a pity as it would be a useful feature as many of our tech

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
port 1863)     dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etherington, Darrell Sent: Wed Feb 19 8:22 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN Dirk,   Ok, thanks for the info, this is a pity as it would be

RE: [SA-list] Ouch!! V4 beta to released v4 upgrade warning

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Had a similar problem when installing ours, if you have a registered copy and install the V4 over the top you must enter the new reg key before importing the old hosts file otherwise it stops at the 10 entries and truncates the existing file. Fortunately I had backed it up! Darrell. -Origin

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
bject: RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN   With only support direct MSN sending, not via a proxy.  And we do not plan on adding it in the near future.     dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etherington, Darrell Sent: Wed Feb 19 6:

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etherington, Darrell Sent: Wed Feb 19 5:31 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN Hi Dirk,   SA Version 4.0.1302   In default setup a username and password have been specified and it is ticked as enabled, I have checked these direct

RE: [SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
a default TO?         dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etherington, Darrell Sent: Wed Feb 19 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] V4 and MSN Dirk,   Have upgraded to V4 and everything seems to be wo

[SA-list] V4 and MSN

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Dirk,   Have upgraded to V4 and everything seems to be working fine expect I'm having some issues with MSN,  I'm getting the message in the log message failed, there was an error connecting. State: 0   I've checked all the obvious settings but can't find anything wrong.  I can also log

RE: [SA-list] Ver 4.0

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
them up (they are in the registry)       dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etherington, Darrell Sent: Wed Feb 19 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Ver 4.0 Dirk,   Just about to upgrade to version 4.0, a

[SA-list] Ver 4.0

2003-02-19 Thread Etherington, Darrell
Dirk,   Just about to upgrade to version 4.0, a quick question, I know I can import the old hosts file but will I be able to import the old people and team's files? Or will they be picked up automatically provided I don't erase the old version first?   Thanks and regards,   Darrell Et