Not Yet, but have it planned.
Paul
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Perfmon monitors problem
Have you tried the new version (the one I talked about in a previous post
today)
Have you tried the new version (the one I talked about in a previous post
today)
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed Nov 20 10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Perfmon monitors problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: [SA-list] Perfmon monitors problem
Stefano,
Have you tried using "(machinename)\(username)" for the login name field in
the login box?
It sou
27;
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Perfmon monitors problem
Stefano,
Have you tried using "(machinename)\(username)" for the login name field in
the login box?
It sounds like the SA machine is using the domain security context by
default when attaching to non-domain machines. This sounds li
Stefano,
Have you tried using "(machinename)\(username)" for the login name field in
the login box?
It sounds like the SA machine is using the domain security context by
default when attaching to non-domain machines. This sounds like normal
behavior for NT/2000 authentication.
If you put "(mach
t
the host file manually.
-Original Message-
From: Vaes, Joep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Perfmon monitors problem
I am also confused on how it behaves. I have expirienced similar problems. I
don&#
I am also confused on how it behaves. I have expirienced similar problems. I
don't have them right now, but do not know how it got fixed. What I tried
was copying the pdh.dll (the performance counter library) from the windir to
the serversalive dir. I do not know whether it was this that solved it.
