RE: [SA-list] SA web server

2003-02-18 Thread Shedd, Samuel
bruary 18, 2003 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA web server   Very simple.  You can't edit the page.     dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shedd, Samuel Sent: Tue Feb 18 11:30 PM To: '[

RE: [SA-list] SA web server

2003-02-18 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
Very simple.  You can't edit the page.   dirk. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shedd, SamuelSent: Tue Feb 18 11:30 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [SA-list] SA web server Can someone explain to me the process of e

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread rtemple
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sswalk.com>cc: Sent by: Sub

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Mark Bradshaw
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woznicki, Doug Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:12 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web Yes to both Doug Woznicki -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04,

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Woznicki, Doug
Yes to both Doug Woznicki -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web As an informal poll, how many folks on this list have already installed the .Net framework on work

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Farmer, Marcus
>As an informal poll, how many folks on this list have already installed the >.Net framework on work machines, and how many are comfortable with doing that? Several workstations have it and most of the servers do too. The install is very straight-forward without any hiccups. Be sure you get the

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Kevin Stone
I haven't but can with no problem. -Kevin > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Bradshaw > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web > > &g

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Mark Bradshaw
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web -- Original Message -- From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:03:07 -0500 >Is it going to implement SA control via the web inte

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Brent Ozar
-- Original Message -- From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:03:07 -0500 >Is it going to implement SA control via the web interface, or just be a >reporting tool? I'm definitely not going to try to c

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Christopher . Osborne
y: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web You could also kill the perl process, but that's definitely a problem. I never encountered it before, but anything's possible. I was considering moving SAWeb into ASP, but I think maybe Brent Oz

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Is it going to implement SA control via the web interface, or just be a reporting tool? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brent Ozar Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web >moving SA

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Brent Ozar
>moving SAWeb into ASP, but I think maybe Brent Ozar was heading in that >direction. I don't want to duplicate efforts. Hey Brent, can you confirm >or deny these rumors? I can neither confirm nor deny that report. ;-) Yeah, seriously, I'm still on it. I got slammed with a couple of surprise

RE: [SA-list] SA Web

2003-02-04 Thread Mark Bradshaw
You could also kill the perl process, but that's definitely a problem. I never encountered it before, but anything's possible. I was considering moving SAWeb into ASP, but I think maybe Brent Ozar was heading in that direction. I don't want to duplicate efforts. Hey Brent, can you confirm or de