Re: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3 check error

2005-08-02 Thread Gerry Aquino
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:17:54 -0400 "David Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have been running the SMTP2POP3 for about a week in a test environment. (limited to ten checks, v5.0.1675) I have two checks. The first does the SMTP and the second does the POP3. The checks run fine for a

RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3 check error

2005-08-02 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
I would do 2 things: * upgrade to 5.0.1748 of Servers Alive (http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/download.asp) (or the latest beta from http://beta.woodstone.nu/soft/salive51.exe) * upgrade SMTP2POP3 to the latest build that is on http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/addons.asp Dirk. --

RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-25 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
.nuSubject: Re: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check This check works great.  The only thing I would like to add is that TLS and SSL are not the same.  Most servers support both.  I found with Google's server one port can handle TLS and the other can handle SSL.  My server can negotiate both so this ch

Re: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-25 Thread Jason Passow
SSL seems to be the same as SMTP with TLS) Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:32 PM To: 'salive@woodstone.nu' Subject: RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check If you have a spare machine, yo

RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-22 Thread Kurt Buff
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 14:15 > To: salive@woodstone.nu > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check > > > Gmail's SMTP server supports it too :-) an

RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-22 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:32 PM To: 'salive@woodstone.nu' Subject: RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check If you have a spare machine, you can load up FreeBSD and get Postfix from the ports tree - it'll ask about

RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-22 Thread Kurt Buff
well. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 11:21 > To: salive@woodstone.nu > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check > > > As I have no access to a TLS enabled server it wi

RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-22 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
As I have no access to a TLS enabled server it will be very difficult to add. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 7:50 PM To: salive@woodstone.nu Subject: Re: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check Sorry

Re: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-22 Thread Jason Passow
Sorry can this be ENHANCED to allow TLS on smtp connections. Dirk Bulinckx wrote: Fixed? Were is the bug? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 7:33 PM To: salive@woodstone.nu Subject: [SA-l

RE: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check

2005-07-22 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
Fixed? Were is the bug? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 7:33 PM To: salive@woodstone.nu Subject: [SA-list] Smtp2POP3 check Can this be fixed to allow TLS when doing smtp? -- Jason Passo

RE: [SA-list] SMTP2POP3 check (mailflow)

2004-11-03 Thread Jason Passow
The smtp2pop3 cannot really identify a slow connection versus a down connection. One cycle it send the email and the next cycle (depending on your configuration) it receives it. If it does not receive the appropriate mail (sequence number if you will) then it is down. Now you can control how of

RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check

2004-08-27 Thread Jason Passow
: RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check So the box running SA was still connected to the network, but the router on the network (that goes to the internet) was no longer connected to the internet? Or was the router no longer connected to the network? BOX(a)-ROUTER--(b)internet Was it (a

RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check

2004-08-27 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check >From the router. The only thing that would be down is outgoing mail and internet. (the rest are dependent on the internet check). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM

RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check

2004-08-27 Thread Jason Passow
TED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check The network from the box running Servers Alive? Or from the router on the network? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check

2004-08-27 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
The network from the box running Servers Alive? Or from the router on the network? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check I

RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check

2004-08-27 Thread Jason Passow
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 3:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check I suppose you have no clear idea on what exactly the com check was doing when the connection went down? Within the POP3 part ther

RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check

2004-08-27 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
Original Message- From: Jason Passow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 3:16 PM To: 'Dirk Bulinckx' Subject: RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check Sorry my mail server was still down when you responded most likely (well the ip address to the our mail server was not in our

RE: [SA-list] SMTp2pop3 check

2004-08-27 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
You send a similar message a couple of days ago and I responded with: " What SMTP2POP3 are you using?  The COM version or the errorlevel version? Do you have any idea how the system (isp) went down?  Is the the whole server or just the smtp/pop3 services or was it network connectivity? I'm