Re: GoodSAMC

2001-04-28 Thread Paul Walker
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:02:07AM +0200, Robert van der Veeke wrote: > No he only had the rights to distribute them, that is something completely > different from holding the copyright. But Bob being Bob tried to explain in > such a way that it looks like he rights where just as important as thos

Re: GoodSAMC

2001-04-28 Thread David Ledbury
- Original Message - From: "Paul Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:31 PM Subject: Re: GoodSAMC > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:02:07AM +0200, Robert van der Veeke wrote: > > > No he only had the rights to distribute them, that is something completely > > diffe

Re: GoodSAMC

2001-04-28 Thread Paul Walker
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:56:29PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote: > And what happened to the Sam clocks Good grief, I'd forgotten all about those. People still haven't received them? -- Paul Some of us don't have cable. Me, for instance. I don't have it because I'm afraid that if I did, I'd

Re: GoodSAMC

2001-04-28 Thread David Ledbury
- Original Message - From: "Paul Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:58 PM Subject: Re: GoodSAMC > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:56:29PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote: > > > And what happened to the Sam clocks > > Good grief, I'd forgotten all about those. Peop