On Nov 23, 2004, at 10:41 pm, Simon Owen wrote:
Gavin Smith wrote:
(1) So that warez style GoodSAMC collections are not needed
Do you have any quality control plans? GoodSAMC seemed to hoover up
anything and everything, [...]
- the new SAM archive will have to be careful not to fall into
On Nov 23, 2004, at 9:02 pm, Andy Chandler wrote:
It will be nice to have as a kind of museum of all things SAM.
Something semi-official, that both old-hands and new faces can
go. On that note, I put my vote forwards for the samcoupe.org
address.
That, or (since it's
Sounds great Gavin,
I'm voting for
samcoupe.org
Or maybe SamCoupeWorld.org ? ;-)
Frans
Another one for samcoupe.org here. Let's ignore the SAM Elite, cos that was
just a bastardised version of the Coupe!
This is the kind of thing this list SHOULD exist for. Obviously, we don't
want to tread on the toes of those who are still plying a trade with the
machine, but an archive of what
I always wonder why people love these security
holes!
You just informed us that you have got a new e-mail address,
and you send the e-mail from your new address. So I must ask: What happens, if
tomorrow I send another e-mail like this see below?
---
From: "Bob Wilkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:54 pm, Aley Keprt wrote:
I always wonder why people love these security holes!
You just informed us that you have got a new e-mail address, and you
send the e-mail from your new address. So I must ask: What happens, if
tomorrow I send another e-mail like this see below?
--- Gavin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking a lot about this software archive
idea we've been talking
about, so thought I'd write up a little summary of
what my thoughts are.
Proposal:
A World Of Spectrum style semi-official archive for
SAM software, housed on the
web
A World Of Spectrum style semi-official archive for SAM
software, housed on the
web and built by the members of sam-users.
Bang on.
BTW another vote here for samcoupe.org
Dan.
This, on the other hand, is probably going to be watched eagle-eyed by
people who were actually around at the time and have some idea what
they're talking about. Provided there's some feedback mechanism (and
it's okay to have a single point of contact now, because all the
software is
Quoting Johnna [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps we could divide the site into:
Official games releases
Official utils releases
Official disk mag releases
PD Single program files (eg. Not disks with Tetris AND something else on,
just Tetris on it's own?)
Warez collections (eg. Speccy 128
Dan Doore wrote:
A World Of Spectrum style semi-official archive for SAM software,
housed on the web and built by the members of sam-users.
Bang on.
BTW another vote here for samcoupe.org
While I agree in principle that samcoupe.org would be the best for the site
I think that as Colin has
Quoting Geoff Winkless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dan Doore wrote:
A World Of Spectrum style semi-official archive for SAM software,
housed on the web and built by the members of sam-users.
Bang on.
BTW another vote here for samcoupe.org
While I agree in principle that samcoupe.org
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:04:50 - Johnna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PD Single program files (eg. Not disks with Tetris AND something else on,
just Tetris on it's own?)
Possibly grouping this further into
* PD Demos
* PD Games
And others:
Source code
Documentation
-Frode
--
^ Frode
Geoff Winkless wrote:
While I agree in principle that samcoupe.org would be the best for the
site
I think that as Colin has samcoupe.com it will serve to confuse.
I would have to agree, i've had the samcoupe.com domain for over a year,
although time has been lacking to fully impliment the site
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:08:50 + Gavin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a long think about hosting and our options and ways of doing it on the
cheap but in the end I thought it would be nice to spend a fiver a month and
get our own meaty bandwidth etc and not worry about taking
Gavin Smith wrote:
A three month period has been decided upon as a reasonable length of time
to
track down as many authors/copyright holders as possible - between us all,
we
should be able to cover the majority of the SAM back catalogue.
Good to see you have adopted my suggestion there, which
Gavin Smith wrote:
Quoting Geoff Winkless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What sort of bandwidth do people think it would use? I already have
a shared (with a few old uni mates) linux host (on which I have root
access) and would be happy to host it if we're expecting a gig or so
downloads a month - that
Simon Owen wrote:
SimCoupe does have some convenience features that aren't true to the
real machine, such as turbo mode, fast disk access, fast startup, and
auto-booting. Adding support for fixed variable speeds (25%, 50%,
200%, ...) probably falls under the same category, and is something
The only problem I have with services like catalyst2 (the site you
mentioned) is that you don't have full control: it's a hosted service, so
you have the restrictions of what you can do with it. I have full ssh root
access so if (eg) you want to run some bizarre forum software you don't have
I always wonder why people love these security holes!
You just informed us that you have got a new e-mail address, and you
send the e-mail from your new address. So I must ask: What happens, if
tomorrow I send another e-mail like this see below?
What alternative do you suggest? Even if the
20 matches
Mail list logo
