). So I'm back to the drawing
board.
Thanks for the help.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Edwin Blink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: SAMDOS
As far as I remember SAMDOS uses fixed adresses for IX/UIFA.
UIFA must
Isn't MasterDOS effectively PD now? You could just require people to have
that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Brant
Sent: 11/21/2007 1:56 PM
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: SAMDOS
I've had ago with your information
As far as I remember SAMDOS uses fixed adresses for IX/UIFA.
UIFA must be equal 4B00 (I think).
Edwin
- Original Message -
From: David Brant
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 10:30 PM
Subject: SAMDOS
Hi All
Can anyone tell me why the following code works
Mac Buster wrote:
Hello!
Could someone explain me what is where in SamDOS file descriptor ?
Certainly. Here is an extract from the SAM Coupe Technical Manual
version 3.0 (pages 78-81):
_SAM_DISK_OPERATING_SYSTEM_
_INTRODUCTION_
SAMDOS has been designed specifically for
Gasson wrote:
[...]
Certainly. Here is an extract from the SAM Coupe Technical Manual
version 3.0 (pages 78-81):
Thanks! Do you have other pages of Technical Manual typed too ? :)
[...]
I think that about covers it.
Seems like it is :)
Why do you ask, by the way?
I am thinking to
Mac Buster wrote:
Thanks! Do you have other pages of Technical Manual typed too ? :)
Nope, sorry. I just typed those ones out especially for you.
(...)
Why do you ask, by the way?
I am thinking to make small .dsk files manager for BeOS r5 (free
release), if this will work on my hardware
At 1:59 pm +0400 2/4/00, Mac Buster wrote:
I am thinking to make small .dsk files manager for BeOS r5 (free
release), if this will work on my hardware =)
You might want to have a look at http://mnemotech.ucam.org/dskmanANSI.c
Andrew
--
-- Andrew Collier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Life
Andrew Collier wrote:
[...]
You might want to have a look at http://mnemotech.ucam.org/dskmanANSI.c
Thanks! That source code can be useful.
Andrew
In a message dated 21/11/98 21:59:33, you write:
At 9:37 pm + 21/11/98, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 18/11/98 19:21:30, you write:
Who owns the SamDOS copyright, and is there permission to freely
distribute it?
Copyright held by Revelation Software. However, a SAMDOS image
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:07:19 + (GMT)
From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Sam Users Mailing List sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: SamDOS copyright.
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 98 21:50:27 GMT
[Snip]
Don't forget that BDOS
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Simon Cooke wrote:
Tim (who is putting QDOS on his forthcoming disk image)
Ummm.. Tim... QDOS is actually SAMDOS 2.2 with a front-end added onto it
which cleans up your system and tells you what hardware you have. That's
all - so it's the same copyright issue.
Oh,
In a message dated 18/11/98 19:21:30, you write:
Who owns the SamDOS copyright, and is there permission to freely
distribute it?
Copyright held by Revelation Software. However, a SAMDOS image can be
distributed free of charge as EVERY computer sold had one.
The manual, and of course the
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:07:19 + (GMT)
From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Sam Users Mailing List sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: SamDOS copyright.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who owns the SamDOS copyright, and is there permission to freely
distribute it?
Given that in the good old days
However, disks have been sold with SAMDOS on them since time began, so I
personally wouldn't worry about it one iota.
Si
am i right in thinking MasterDos isn't quite so free? i can't remember,
but i'm pretty sure you're not allowed to distribute discs with masterdos
on them. samdos 2 no
14 matches
Mail list logo
