[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a remark - if my last post came to you broken (like only 3 sentences), then ignore it, please. I wrote quite a long one, but it was cutted down and I don't know the reason.Sorry for inconvienence!ellvisYeah, it was only three lines... it seems to say enough though :
I can categorically say that it didnt work
> -Original Message-
> From: Frans van Egmond [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:35 PM
> To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
> Subject: Re: test
>
> David Ledbury wrote:
>
> > - Original Me
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:51:32PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote:
> I hear me as well.
Ah, but can you still hear the Voices?
--
Paul
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
David Ledbury wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Frans v. Egmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: test
>
> > Quoting Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > test
> >
wibble
- Original Message -
From: "Chris White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: test
> 123
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Aley Keprt
> Sent:
- Original Message -
From: "Frans v. Egmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: test
> Quoting Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > test
> >
> >
>
>
> I hear you !!!
I hear me as well.
Quoting Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> test
>
>
I hear you !!!
123
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Aley Keprt
Sent: 08 May 2001 14:19
To: Sam Users
Subject: test
test
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Chris Pile wrote:
> This is a test to see if I've entered the SAM group address in my address
> book correctly...
Looks like it.
(someone had too!)
@/
.@/
Unc - Tim Paveley - Moderator of "The Ga
Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
>
> > I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
>
> Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/
Ooh my speciality ...
--
I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
> I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
> > Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
> Erm I thought you said it didn't ...
Did for the other lists, for some strange reason.
On 19 Oct 1998 14:47:57 +0100, Lee Willis said:
> I'd guess that he just expects one space to be there, I'd recommend
> something along the lines of
>
> ^From.*owner-sam-users
>
> which should cover it pretty well
But there's only one From line which ever contains owner-sam-users and
that's
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:44:12 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
> > OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
> Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
imc
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
> > OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
> Yep, problem numero uno ...
I was confused by the fact that all the other lists filtered okay, and
they had a :O there as well. Changed it now and it's working, so.. :)
> I'd guess that he just ex
Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
>
> > OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
>
> Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
Erm I thought you said it didn't ...
Lee.
--
I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old
Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OnMon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
> > # Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
> > :O c
> > backup
> >
> > # Mailing list section
> > # this doesn't work either :/
> > :O:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > sam-users
>
> [snip]
>
> OK, fi
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
> OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
> The subsidiary question is what character you expect to be matched by
> the dot, except for a space.
Just a space.
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
> # Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
> :O c
> backup
>
> # Mailing list section
> # this doesn't work either :/
> :O:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> sam-users
[snip]
OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
The subsidia
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
> Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type
> debate but what's your recipe ?
Apologies for non-unix people...
===
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log
VERBOSE=on
LOGABSTRACT=all
# Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
:O c
backu
Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote:
>
> Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into
> the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why.
Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type
debate but
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote:
> > 'scuse me, just one quick test.
> And here's another
Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into
the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why.
Paul Walker wrote:
>
> 'scuse me, just one quick test.
And here's another
23 matches
Mail list logo
