RE: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread Si Owen
Simon Cooke wrote: > To be honest... I couldn't find it either... I followed your > directions, and couldn't understand anything that was there (it was > all in Russian). I nosied around, couldn't find anything in English, Clicking on the British flag seems to make it worse! If you click straight

Re: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread Simon Cooke
To be honest... I couldn't find it either... I followed your directions, and couldn't understand anything that was there (it was all in Russian). I nosied around, couldn't find anything in English, looked at the pretty picture, and moved on. > Remind me to copy a roadmap next time ;) > > Anyone wi

Re: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread David L
- Original Message - From: Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 11:02 PM Subject: Re: your mail > On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:33:14PM -, David L wrote: > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to >

Re: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread Ian Collier
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:33:14PM -, David L wrote: > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > some people on the list. Quite possibly. However, you neglected to mention that this was what your post was about, and didn't give proper directions to it. imc

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Martin Fitzpatrick
Gordon Wallis wrote: > > Martin Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > David L wrote: > > > > > > Dont be pedantic > > > > > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > > > some people on the list. > > > [snip] > > > > well, it interested me... perhaps people here should e

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Gordon Wallis
Martin Fitzpatrick wrote: > > David L wrote: > > > > Dont be pedantic > > > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > > some people on the list. > [snip] > > well, it interested me... perhaps people here should eat more winegums? > ;) > Well, I second _that_

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Martin Fitzpatrick
David L wrote: > > Dont be pedantic > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > some people on the list. I thought the point you were making was about its method of emulating a speccy right?.. About having a card in the pc's isa?.. If thats not what it said

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Gavin Smith
David L wrote: > > Dont be pedantic > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > some people on the list. > > Obviously not. > > Oh well. Don't worry David, it was interesting, thank you for pointing the URL out to us. Some people just like to complain about

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread David L
Dont be pedantic A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. Obviously not. Oh well. - Original Message - From: Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:11 PM Subject: Re: your mail On Mon,

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Ian Collier
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 09:05:09PM -, David L wrote: > Anyone still actually interested in their Sam - try this site... click on > the Union Flag tho ;) > http://virtuals.atlant.ru/peters/e-index.htm Normally I ignore people who just post URLs without saying why I should go to them. You coul

Re: your mail

1999-08-30 Thread Ian Collier
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 09:02:58AM +0100, Me wrote: > test Er, yes. Thank you for that fascinating insight... imc

Re: your mail

1999-07-10 Thread Stuart Brady
Jonathan Bristow wrote: >hmmm >I also heard that some scientists have managed to teleport a single Atom. How far? And how many floppies have the teleported? -- Stuart Brady

Re: your mail

1999-07-10 Thread Jonathan Bristow
hmmm I also heard that some scientists have managed to teleport a single Atom. Respect Another Stranger -Original Message- From: Diggory Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Date: 10 July 1999 01:32 Subject: Re: your mail >Hi di ho > >An

Re: your mail

1999-07-10 Thread Diggory Gray
Hi di ho Andrew Gale wrote: > > > internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). > > > > Are you sure about that? Thought I heard some stuff recently about quantum entangled teleportation using photons... Straying off the subject? :-) Diggory

Re: your mail

1999-07-08 Thread Andrew Gale
> internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). > Are you sure about that?

Re: your mail

1999-07-08 Thread Robert van der Veeke
> Van: Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Aan: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no > Onderwerp: Re: your mail > Datum: donderdag, juli 08, 1999 2:00 > > 2, Does anyone want any Spectrum games? (there are about one > > hundred)Although I can't afford to post the games so t

Re: your mail

1999-07-08 Thread Aley Keprt
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Rob Smith wrote: > Hello Sam Users, > > I recently rediscovered my Spectrum and Sam and have since been transferring > Specy games to Sam disc via a Messenger. I have to get rid of quite a few > specy game as I have little space to keep them all (although I am keeping a >

Re: your mail

1999-02-28 Thread Graham Goring
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Si Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Graham Goring wrote: >> Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the part of the message >> that they are replying too. Makes more sense, especially when replying >> to several different sections in a message, like: > >Are w

RE: your mail

1999-02-28 Thread Si Owen
Graham Goring wrote: > Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the part of the message > that they are replying too. Makes more sense, especially when replying > to several different sections in a message, like: Are we saying the same thing? I prefer the text for the reply to be below wha

Re: your mail

1999-02-27 Thread Graham Goring
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Si Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Lee Willis wrote: >> And if it is necessary the quote should be at the top. > >I think most people prefer it that way, it's more intuitive as you have a >context to read the reply in! Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follo

RE: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Si Owen
Lee Willis wrote: > And if it is necessary the quote should be at the top. I think most people prefer it that way, it's more intuitive as you have a context to read the reply in! There's one guy at our company that still puts his comments BELOW blocks of code, which is most irritating to read!!

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Lee Willis
Dave Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote? i only ever > do that when it's necessary to follow the sense of the thread. i often > just type above the quote because i think it's better (and sometimes it > isn't - like now) If it's not nec

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Ian Collier
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 02:40:52PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: > Fair enough > > On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: > > > Yes. HTH. imc Pred. imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Dave Hooper
Fair enough On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: > Yes. HTH. imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Ian Collier
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 02:20:19PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: > is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote? Yes. HTH. imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Dave Hooper
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: > (Why is your quoting upside down?) quoting? upside down? how'd'you mean, guv? i'm using pine, it's not clever, i just reply to the message and put my own additions absolutely wherever i like. is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Ian Collier
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 01:49:26PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: > ... i must've missed something ... in-joke, right? > > On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Martin Krammer wrote: > > help No, it just means Frode hasn't got "administrivia" turned on in the list config. :-) (Why is your quoting upside down?) imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Dave Hooper
... i must've missed something ... in-joke, right? dave On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Martin Krammer wrote: > help >

Re: your mail

1999-02-18 Thread Ian Collier
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 12:01:24PM -, Chris White wrote: > unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. You can't. We refuse to let you go. imc