> > You can use Wordpad to read the RTF, if your Word can't do it.
> > I use RTF because its functionality is 100% the same as DOC's one,
> > and RTF files are 5-8 times shorter than DOC ones, since DOC uses
unicode.
>
> No, you are wrong. RTF functionality is not 100% the same as DOC
> functionali
"Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When distributing documentation, you should always make sure that whoever is
> receiving your software is able to actually read that documentation!
This is a very good point. Therefore use the lowest common denominator which
does the job. In 90% of the
From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ok, I stand corrected.
> It's a shame, then, that they didn't make Word forwardly compatible with
new
> extensions to the RTF format ... they could've just made Word ignore
unknown
> tags (the { HYPERLINK } tag) rather than spew up Error! Bookmark Not
> Def
From: Simon Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Umm... given that to my knowledge, Microsoft invented and maintains the
RTF
> format, I think they're authorized to extend it in any way they feel fit.
>
> IMNSHO, of course.
> Simon
Ok, I stand corrected.
It's a shame, then, that they didn't make Word forw
From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, by adding customised control codes to the .RTF format and thereby
> making non-standard extensions to a standardised document format! (Have
you
> not learned about Microsoft yet?)
Umm... given that to my knowledge, Microsoft invented and maintains the
> > Hmm, in which case why is it a .RTF file? After all, Rich Text
> > Format is meant to be a platform and program independant format, so
> > if your response is to limit the reading of the file to later
> > versions of Microsoft Word, would it not therefore make more sense to
> > simply save it
> > 2. Get a later Word version.
>
> Hmm, in which case why is it a .RTF file? After all, Rich Text
> Format is meant to be a platform and program independant format, so
> if your response is to limit the reading of the file to later
> versions of Microsoft Word, would it not therefore make more s
> > 1. Credits? No problem. I will do the changes to let you sleep better.
>
> Ok. Thanks,
>
> > 2. Get a later Word version.
>
> No.
> " I am a poor student "
> (That excuse used to work anyway. Doesn't actually apply now that I am no
> longer a student nor poor)
As I wrote earlier, you can
> 1. Credits? No problem. I will do the changes to let you sleep better.
Ok. Thanks,
> 2. Get a later Word version.
No.
" I am a poor student "
(That excuse used to work anyway. Doesn't actually apply now that I am no
longer a student nor poor)
> 3. I don't know your web address.
Well, you sho
> 2. Get a later Word version.
Hmm, in which case why is it a .RTF file? After all, Rich Text
Format is meant to be a platform and program independant format, so
if your response is to limit the reading of the file to later
versions of Microsoft Word, would it not therefore make more sense to
> >From: Dave Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >I'm a bit disappointed in Aley's SAAEmu 0.61.
> >
> >1. Credit on the main screen (as requested!). Preferably
> >immediately below the line that says "Z80 emulator by FMS
> >&
> I'm a bit disappointed in Aley's SAAEmu 0.61.
>
>
> 1. Credit on the main screen (as requested!). Preferably immediately below
> the line that says "Z80 emulator by FMS & Aley Keprt, libraries by (c) FMS
> 1996". If possible, credit should say "
>-Original Message-
>From: Dave Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I'm a bit disappointed in Aley's SAAEmu 0.61.
>
>1. Credit on the main screen (as requested!). Preferably
>immediately below the line that says "Z80 emulator by FMS
>& Aley Kep
I'm a bit disappointed in Aley's SAAEmu 0.61.
1. Credit on the main screen (as requested!). Preferably immediately below
the line that says "Z80 emulator by FMS & Aley Keprt, libraries by (c) FMS
1996". If possible, credit should say "SAA-1099 emulator (c)1
Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sam Users
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 3:51 PM
Subject: SAAemu 0.61
>
> The latest SAAemu 0.61 is available at my web site. It was there for weeks
> already, but there some people announced problems with downloading the
> file. Now it is fixed. Cli
The latest SAAemu 0.61 is available at my web site. It was there for weeks
already, but there some people announced problems with downloading the
file. Now it is fixed. Click to download the file directly:
http://risc.upol.cz/~keprta/soft/sam/saa061.zip
The package contains the player, and
16 matches
Mail list logo
