In a message dated 21/11/98 21:59:33, you write:
At 9:37 pm + 21/11/98, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 18/11/98 19:21:30, you write:
Who owns the SamDOS copyright, and is there permission to freely
distribute it?
Copyright held by Revelation Software. However, a SAMDOS image
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:07:19 + (GMT)
From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Sam Users Mailing List sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: SamDOS copyright.
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 98 21:50:27 GMT
[Snip]
Don't forget that BDOS
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Simon Cooke wrote:
Tim (who is putting QDOS on his forthcoming disk image)
Ummm.. Tim... QDOS is actually SAMDOS 2.2 with a front-end added onto it
which cleans up your system and tells you what hardware you have. That's
all - so it's the same copyright issue.
Oh,
In a message dated 18/11/98 19:21:30, you write:
Who owns the SamDOS copyright, and is there permission to freely
distribute it?
Copyright held by Revelation Software. However, a SAMDOS image can be
distributed free of charge as EVERY computer sold had one.
The manual, and of course the source
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:07:19 + (GMT)
From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Sam Users Mailing List sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: SamDOS copyright.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who owns the SamDOS copyright, and is there permission to freely
distribute it?
Given that in the good old days
However, disks have been sold with SAMDOS on them since time began, so I
personally wouldn't worry about it one iota.
Si
am i right in thinking MasterDos isn't quite so free? i can't remember,
but i'm pretty sure you're not allowed to distribute discs with masterdos
on them. samdos 2 no
