[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a remark - if my last post came to you broken (like only 3 sentences), then ignore it, please. I wrote quite a long one, but it was cutted down and I don't know the reason.Sorry for inconvienence!ellvisYeah, it was only three lines... it seems to say enough though :
Just a remark - if my last post came to you broken (like only 3 sentences),
then ignore it, please. I wrote quite a long one, but it was cutted down and I
don't know the reason.
Sorry for inconvienence!
ellvis
I can categorically say that it didnt work
> -Original Message-
> From: Frans van Egmond [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:35 PM
> To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
> Subject: Re: test
>
> David Ledbury wrote:
>
> > - Original Me
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:51:32PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote:
> I hear me as well.
Ah, but can you still hear the Voices?
--
Paul
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
David Ledbury wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Frans v. Egmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: test
>
> > Quoting Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > test
> >
wibble
- Original Message -
From: "Chris White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: test
> 123
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Aley Keprt
> Sent:
- Original Message -
From: "Frans v. Egmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: test
> Quoting Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > test
> >
> >
>
>
> I hear you !!!
I hear me as well.
Quoting Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> test
>
>
I hear you !!!
123
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Aley Keprt
Sent: 08 May 2001 14:19
To: Sam Users
Subject: test
test
test
Edwin Blink wrote:
>
> set the wrong forwarding address this afternoon and probably caused a view
> bounces I guess
> (Don't take me of the list please !)
>
> last message I recieved was:
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 13:10:45 +0100
> From: Martin Fitzpatrick <
set the wrong forwarding address this afternoon and probably caused a view
bounces I guess
(Don't take me of the list please !)
last message I recieved was:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 13:10:45 +0100
From: Martin Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Did I miss anything ?
Yes a test
Am I still here.
Bob Wilkinson.
> > Um, er. The *envelopes* can be 3 or 4-bit resolution, like the docs
imply.
> > However, the VOLUME registers (ie, sound registers 0 thru 5) only
provide
> > 3-bit resolution when envelopes are enabled (normally they would provide
> > 4-bits resolution ... it's as if the SAA has gone thru regist
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 19. listopadu 1999 3:36
Subject: Re: New WinCoupe alpha test version (Was: Re: Defender)
> > > However, the VOLUME registers (ie, sound registers 0 thru 5) only
> provide
> > >
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 19. listopadu 1999 1:53
Subject: Re: New WinCoupe alpha test version (Was: Re: Defender)
> > > (e.g. the volume
> > > control registers should provide 16 levels of amplitude contro
> Not necessarily - my SAA emulation doesn't necessarily take into account
all
> the many ways in which the chip does unexpected things (e.g. the volume
> control registers should provide 16 levels of amplitude control ... UNLESS
> ENVELOPES ARE ENABLED IN WHICH CASE ONLY 8 UNIQUE LEVELS ARE PROVID
> > However, the VOLUME registers (ie, sound registers 0 thru 5) only
provide
> > 3-bit resolution when envelopes are enabled (normally they would provide
> > 4-bits resolution ... it's as if the SAA has gone thru registers 0 to 5
> and
> > ANDed with 0xee before using them, whenever envelopes are
From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Um, er. The *envelopes* can be 3 or 4-bit resolution, like the docs imply.
> However, the VOLUME registers (ie, sound registers 0 thru 5) only provide
> 3-bit resolution when envelopes are enabled (normally they would provide
> 4-bits resolution ... it's as
> > Bit of a question for all (although mainly Si Owen and Andrew Collier, I
> > suspect). In SamMines, played on a Real SAM, when Arnie does his
WrongWrong
> > bit, is it meant to sound smooth and seamless and flowing?
>
> Er - Well yes, just like any other sound sample. (Actually, it was Ian who
> > (e.g. the volume
> > control registers should provide 16 levels of amplitude control ...
UNLESS
> > ENVELOPES ARE ENABLED IN WHICH CASE ONLY 8 UNIQUE LEVELS ARE PROVIDED !
>
> Really?? The docs do imply that you can play envelopes in either a 3-bit
> or 4-bit mode - are they lying?
Um, er. The
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Dave Hooper wrote:
> (e.g. the volume
> control registers should provide 16 levels of amplitude control ... UNLESS
> ENVELOPES ARE ENABLED IN WHICH CASE ONLY 8 UNIQUE LEVELS ARE PROVIDED !
Really?? The docs do imply that you can play envelopes in either a 3-bit
or 4-bit mode
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Dave Hooper wrote:
> Bit of a question for all (although mainly Si Owen and Andrew Collier, I
> suspect). In SamMines, played on a Real SAM, when Arnie does his WrongWrong
> bit, is it meant to sound smooth and seamless and flowing?
Er - Well yes, just like any other sound s
! My
dll will still provide 16 levels ==> 4 bit (rather than 3-bit) sound
resolution for samples)
And other examples like that.
D a v e
- Original Message -
From: Simon Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: New WinCoupe alpha tes
I did notice that my MegaBlast and Star Trek demos sound MUCH better on
WinCoupe than on a real SAM, which is kind of strange :)
Simon
> Hennyway, try the version of saasound.dll that's at
> http://www.geocities.com/stripwax/saasound.zip
> With a bit of luck the (new! improved! well, ok, a big gl
lems (ST_SOUND works fine, y'see).
The sound emulation works thru directsound, so NT4 shouldn't have any
problems in playing sound ... but my saasound.dll is what's responsible for
generating that sound ... and more than likely there's still a few bugs in
my envelope controll
Simon Cooke wrote:
> especially as somehow it manages to play samples back
Just careful line and cycle counter timing for the gap between each out, and
calls to Dave superb sound DLL to generate the data itself. I'd already
done the video generation using the same sort of method so it wasn't too
From: Chris Pile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >>Aw, go on then, as long as you promise the GPL goblins won't
> >come and get
> >>me! I've uploaded a new alpha test version to:
> >>http://www.obobo.demon.co.uk/WinCoupe.zip
>
> It's brillian
>>Aw, go on then, as long as you promise the GPL goblins won't
>come and get
>>me! I've uploaded a new alpha test version to:
>>http://www.obobo.demon.co.uk/WinCoupe.zip
It's brilliant!
me and get
>me! I've uploaded a new alpha test version to:
>http://www.obobo.demon.co.uk/WinCoupe.zip
Fantastic! :-))
It's fast, it's cool and it works on my machine.
Dave
Simon Cooke wrote:
> Mr. Owen... pretty please... release a new beta? alpha? anything?
Aw, go on then, as long as you promise the GPL goblins won't come and get
me! I've uploaded a new alpha test version to:
http://www.obobo.demon.co.uk/WinCoupe.zip
Please read the text files that
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Chris Pile wrote:
> This is a test to see if I've entered the SAM group address in my address
> book correctly...
Looks like it.
(someone had too!)
@/
.@/
Unc - Tim Paveley - Modera
This is a test to see if I've entered the SAM group address in my address
book correctly...
Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
>
> > I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
>
> Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/
Ooh my speciality ...
--
I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
> I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
> > Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
> Erm I thought you said it didn't ...
Did for the other lists, for some strange reason.
On 19 Oct 1998 14:47:57 +0100, Lee Willis said:
> I'd guess that he just expects one space to be there, I'd recommend
> something along the lines of
>
> ^From.*owner-sam-users
>
> which should cover it pretty well
But there's only one From line which ever contains owner-sam-users and
that's
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:44:12 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
> > OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
> Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
imc
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
> > OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
> Yep, problem numero uno ...
I was confused by the fact that all the other lists filtered okay, and
they had a :O there as well. Changed it now and it's working, so.. :)
> I'd guess that he just ex
Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
>
> > OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
>
> Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
Erm I thought you said it didn't ...
Lee.
--
I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old
Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OnMon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
> > # Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
> > :O c
> > backup
> >
> > # Mailing list section
> > # this doesn't work either :/
> > :O:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > sam-users
>
> [snip]
>
> OK, fi
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
> OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
> The subsidiary question is what character you expect to be matched by
> the dot, except for a space.
Just a space.
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
> # Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
> :O c
> backup
>
> # Mailing list section
> # this doesn't work either :/
> :O:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> sam-users
[snip]
OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
The subsidia
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
> Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type
> debate but what's your recipe ?
Apologies for non-unix people...
===
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log
VERBOSE=on
LOGABSTRACT=all
# Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
:O c
backu
Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote:
>
> Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into
> the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why.
Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type
debate but
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote:
> > 'scuse me, just one quick test.
> And here's another
Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into
the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why.
Paul Walker wrote:
>
> 'scuse me, just one quick test.
And here's another
'scuse me, just one quick test.
49 matches
Mail list logo
