"Unable to install HP LaserJet 5P/5MP Postscript, Windows NT 4.0 or 200,
Intel driver. Operation could not be completed."
maybe it's this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;158042
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://l
hi marco!
Which, in turn, leaves the share still visible in Network Neighborhood
etc, as I initially reported.
Go figure. :)
i don't understand your question. - we're using "browsable = no" over
years. but i did not find, where u'll see the share. i can't see the
share with 'net view' and no
I could do that with Red Hat 7.2 Using smb://netbios name/folder. However,
it was apparently removed from Red Hat 8.0. So, it depends on version of
Linux.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Jim
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 5:03 PM
To: [E
When trying to add the drivers downloaded & extracted from HP
(lj456ps.inf from lj632en.exe) I get the following message:
"Unable to install HP LaserJet 5P/5MP Postscript, Windows NT 4.0 or 200,
Intel driver. Operation could not be completed."
I also tried installing win95/98 drivers. In this c
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:26:47 -0600, Henrickson, Den wrote:
> [sharename$]
[]
> The $ creates a hidden Windows share. To access you would have to do
Right, thanks. I did actually forget that trick.
But, uhm... can it be used also with the [netlogon] share? Will it be
still correctly identif
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 01:57:23 + (GMT), John H Terpstra wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jim Wharton wrote:
>
> > Keep in mind however, this only hides the share in Network Neighborhood/My
> > Network Places/explorer. It is still possible to do a net view command from
> > the command line and see e
I believe Mandrake uses something called "Lisa" for this although I am
not sure if it is win/lin.
pshook wrote:
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box "see" your winbox, just like the
winbox can "see" or browse the Linux box with Samba?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL a
Thank you for your help, so far.
> the docs are equally clear on this part.
Well, maybe if youre an expert, or someone already having experience in
doing this with a NT printer server, but not from my point of view. Also I
dont think the docs are very clear as to that doing this from a windows
cl
I found the cvs repository at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/
The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have been why
google could not find it yesterday.
I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated.
The 0.9.5.1 ver
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 17:00, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote:
> Thanks again for your reply. I did read the part you mention. I did
> understand how to make the print$ share. The docs are clear on this part.
>
> I can now specify my question a bit more: what to do from there on to put
> the nessecary
Thanks again for your reply. I did read the part you mention. I did
understand how to make the print$ share. The docs are clear on this part.
I can now specify my question a bit more: what to do from there on to put
the nessecary files in that share?
I am not using windows myself, but my users a
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 16:05, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote:
> > the samba howto collection covers the print$ stuff accurately for
> > all the 2.2 version and the 3.0 branch too
>
>
> Thank you for your answer Bradley. But Im afraid, that I already looked in
> the howto collection, and I didnt find
How about a different solution:
( cd / ; tar cvzf /path/to/samba/share/etc-$( date +%Y-%m-%d ).tar.gz etc/ )
Then backup the tarball on your windows box. Now you have all of the file
permissions stored inside the tarball.
The problem is that file permissions on Windows and UNIX don't map n
RH73 samba2.2.7-1.7.3
Just getting a smb server going. Have some users who's login names are
different from windows and Linux. Using a map file to map Linux users
accounts to windows user accounts. When I watch the log.smb I see that the
mapping is taking place however, the authentication doesn
> the samba howto collection covers the print$ stuff accurately for
> all the 2.2 version and the 3.0 branch too
Thank you for your answer Bradley. But Im afraid, that I already looked in
the howto collection, and I didnt find information I could use, and gave
up on that. I was hoping someone her
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Nolan Garrett wrote:
> I had a similiar problem: try /home/%S
Why, why specify this? If the /home/%S points to the normal system
location (ie: as specified in /etc/passwd) then there is NO need to set
this. I fully recommend that you optimize the smb.conf file using SWAT or
t
I am having difficulty in try to preserve permissions on Unix files that
are copied from the samba server onto a Windows98 system, and then copied
again via samba back to an 'upload' directory on the samba server.
Specifically, I am sharing "/etc" (samba read only) for backup purposes,
and while l
Reason I ask - is because I couldn't get this to work.
-Original Message-
From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:30 PM
To: pshook
Cc: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze
On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote:
> Is it possible to allow your Liunx box "s
RH73 samba2.2.7-1.7.3
Just getting a smb server going. Have some users who's login names are
different from windows and Linux. Using a map file to map Linux users
accounts to windows user accounts. When I watch the log.smb I see that the
mapping is taking place however, the authentication doesn
Is this without the use of a services on the windows end?
-Original Message-
From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:30 PM
To: pshook
Cc: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze
On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote:
> Is it possible to allow your Liunx box "
On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote:
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box "see" your winbox, just like
the
winbox can "see" or browse the Linux box with Samba?
with gnome2 on my slackware 8.1 box I can use smb:// in the file
manager to view the network. I know that kde also has the ability to
vie
>> Third problem is locally stored profiles. How I could make such set up that when
>> user logs out from WS , then WS
>> would copy changed profile back to server and delete it from WS ?
>> It's question of security and hard disk space..
> you can do that with a setting in gpedit.msc
> don't reme
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 12:28, pshook wrote:
> Is it possible to allow your Liunx box "see" your winbox, just like the
> winbox can "see" or browse the Linux box with Samba?
yes
smbclient will do what you want i think
brad
--
Bradley W. Langhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe from this l
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:56, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote:
> Also, I am wondering about the legality of the process: That
> is, since my users are residents at my dorm, they have their own private
> software, and the dorm which is running the server, doesnt have any
> windows licenses. I could borr
I think my previous message didnt reach the list. Therefor a resend.
Hi.
Im an admin on a small network with about 100 clients running windows 95,
98, 98SE, windows 2000 and XP. Our server is running samba 2.2.5
and sharing one HP Laserjet 5M/MP. Our current setup works fine, but I am
wondering
Yes, You will need services for unix (~$80) to make it happen. Or another program
such as maestro nfs. We use services for unix and it works fine for us.
-Original Message-
From: pshook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 3/1/2003 12:28 PM
To: Samba
On Saturday 01 March 2003 09:27 am, pshook wrote:
> Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in
a
> manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with
Samba? Ya
> know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put
> thing?
Check out LinNeighb
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box "see" your winbox, just like the
winbox can "see" or browse the Linux box with Samba?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in a
manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with Samba? Ya
know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put
thing?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Hi.
Im an admin on a small network with about 100 clients running windows 95,
98, 98SE, windows 2000 and XP. Our server is running samba 2.2.5
and sharing one HP Laserjet 5M/MP. Our current setup works fine, but I am
wondering
How do I put windows clients drivers on my samba server to eliminate t
> On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [netlogon] share is like that:
>>
>> [netlogon]
>>comment = Network Logon Service
>>path = /home/samba/netlogon
>>guest ok = no
>>writable = no
>>browseable = yes
>>public = yes
> this is what i'm using ...
> [netlog
AlF schrieb:
When a member of group "users" connects to the [public] or [grp] share
and interacts with them by creating dirs and/or files, something strange
happens because file permissions change to:
/home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0755)
/home/users (owner=root, group=users,
Hi all
I noticed a pretty strange behaviour regarding file permissions that
sometimes change without any reason. I need to share the following two
directories:
/home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0777)
/home/users (owner=root, group=users, perms=0770)
the /home directory is owned
Hi,
I read the changelog, and couldn't help noticing this:
Changes since 2.2.8pre1
---
8) Always use safe_strcpy not pstrcpy for malloc()'d strings
25) Merge from HEAD. Use pstrcpy not safe_strcpy.
Did this change get reverted intentionally ?
regards,
Derkjan de Haan
--
For whatever reason, the Makefiles that are generated don't tell gcc to
look in /usr/local/include for header files. You don't need
--libdir=/usr/local/lib and --includedir=/usr/local/include. I believe
that those just tell where you want the libraries and header files
installed when everythi
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:47:53 -0600
"Brad Sagowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RedHat 7.3 with XFS (using the XFS install disk)
> After installation I'd downloaded 2.2.7 src rpm from redhat and
> rebuilt it with the --with-acl-support option in the samba.spec file
Did you have "acl-dev" installe
36 matches
Mail list logo
